Men's Health Survival of the Fittest 10KHere's how RW members rated this race (54 votes). | 1 to 8 of 8 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture 2008 (8 votes) | | Overall score | | 92% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 70% | | PB potential | | 38% | | Atmosphere | | 85% | | Organisation | | 85% | | Value | | 65% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 70% |
|
|
2008 race reviewed by: Stuart Marren
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Quality day out
Date of review: October 13, 2009
|
2008 race reviewed by: william rivenberg
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: the great tester
In full: complete test of physical character and ability, left me ready to sleep for the week
Date of review: November 27, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Michelle Pank
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great fun and physically tiring!!
Date of review: October 27, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Madmans Return
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great race, made a change from the mundane usual 10K although I think this was more 11 1/22. Definate do again! Fun and recommendedd, just need a bit more space on the obstacles
Date of review: October 18, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Jonycoupster
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A right laugh
In full: Been looking forward to doing this for ages.... and it was a laugh. Very flat course so the actual running was very easy. Price was a bit steep but I didn't mind as great t-shirt and goodie bag and the obstacles were well put together.
Only real complaint was that there should have been more waves with less people in each.... no chance of a fast of competetive time if you weren't in first wave due to having to queue for obstacles.
Other than that really good fun!
Date of review: October 14, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Jimmy F
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Great Challenge
In full: Very enjoyable, hard work but well worth the effort, very difficult in places but alot of fun
Date of review: October 13, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Side Show
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Hard work - in the river twice @ 5k. Great challenge.
Date of review: October 12, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Tude
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fun & friendly - obstacles are tough, but not impossible
In full: Price seems high, but excellent goody bag (not just leaflets for once!)& technical T-shirt and the obstacles must have cost to put in place, which seems to justify it.
Lack of any water at the finish as far as I could see though.
Date of review: October 12, 2008
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
