Not the Roman IXHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (379 votes). | 1 to 10 of 54 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
| The big picture 2006 (54 votes) | | Overall score | | 85% | | How many would do it again? | | 97% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 79% | | PB potential | | 58% | | Atmosphere | | 73% | | Organisation | | 87% | | Value | | 77% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 67% |
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: Samantha Fitter
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good challenge for the post xmas belly In full: What a fab race! Well organised, well attended by runners and spectators, great views and mostly downhill in the second half (well that's what it felt like). But then what else can you expect from stratford upon avon runners club. Good bunch of people who make you feel welcome no matter what your ability is. Date of review: January 30, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Peter Mulligan
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised & great start to the year. Narrow lane at the start was arkward. Date of review: January 27, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Enry
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A well organised scenic event, over an unusual distance. Date of review: January 26, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Boggis
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Started a bit far back in the pack and took me a while to fight my way through on the narrow lane at the start but great race, really enjoyed it. Got a PB but don't think i've ever done a 12k before ! Great organisation. Date of review: January 26, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: The Shuffler
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A really good race. Nearly got PB for the first 10k. Excellent. Date of review: January 26, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Charlotte Beckford
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well marshalled with lots of support, and bar at the finish was very welcome! Date of review: January 24, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Early rising runner
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Brilliantly organised, good atmosphere, testing course! Date of review: January 24, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Andrew Cunnell
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Wonderful start to the year In full: Very friendly, efficient faultless organisation wonderful support. Will do it until I drop. Date of review: January 23, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Scotters
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised and interesting course - 12 km a likeable distance In full: Paced as a 10K with a little downhill 2K bonus section! Well organised, hills made it interesting and great venue - good start to the running calender. Could have done with a less clustered start though Date of review: January 23, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Splash
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: I thought Roman roads were flat! In full: At the beginning it was deja vue Andy Reading - cold, damp and foggy but unlike A.R it was much more challenging. Should come with a health warning for struggling asthmatics (nearly conked out at the 5th) but all praise for the marshalls - plenty of them and all exceedlingly cheery (and honest about the huge hills!) good day out ;0) Date of review: January 23, 2006
|

| |