Cranleigh 15/21Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (298 votes). | 1 to 10 of 38 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 |
| The big picture 2006 (38 votes) | | Overall score | | 83% | | How many would do it again? | | 96% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 79% | | PB potential | | 65% | | Atmosphere | | 68% | | Organisation | | 82% | | Value | | 83% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 68% |
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: Joanne Clark
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: good mix, well organised, massage at the end and cup of tea!
Date of review: November 22, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Alfie
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: An excellent race as always
In full: Organisation excels each year. Difficult to find anything that requires improvement.
Date of review: April 4, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: michael c
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: testing but maybe a week too early.
Date of review: March 31, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Smike
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: First time running 21 miles but now I know what I'm up against. After the 19th mile I found this very tough, and lonely. The traffic was worrying. Do it again? Yes!
Date of review: March 29, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Vincent van Woerkom
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race for the 21 miler. I liked the second loop of 6 miles as there was people still doing their first lap so always someone to aim for which kept the pace good on the last leg. Everyone, runners and organisers very friendly.
Date of review: March 28, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: The Ref
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: no organisational problems apparent to this tail ender
In full: not an event to do when one is recovering from a bad back hence 15 instead of 21!! That was the personal downside to the day but as far as marshals etc were concerned, there was no chance of going astray so fair play to the organisers. Location of HQ excellent, toilets etc for the start, town centre and supermarket for refuelling afterwards. Just a pity about the back with just four weeks to London!
Date of review: March 28, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Gabs
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very well organised and marshalled
In full: Not a reflection on the race at all, but some motorists were less than considerate, with one car driving a few millimetres away from me, which made me drop my water bottle.
Date of review: March 27, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Leo M
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Lovely race, would definitely do it again
In full: Slightly hillier than I'd expected and it takes quite some willpower to push yourself past the finish funnel to do the second of the 6 mile loops, but a really nice race overall. Could do with another water station or two to make it perfect.
Date of review: March 27, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Smurfette
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Hilly
Date of review: March 27, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Lorenzo
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised undulating run through the Surrey countryside
In full: Enjoyed it as my first 20+ race - well organised, friendly atmosphere and good route. Toilet facilities at the start could have been better. Don't know whether it was me, but I only found out once I'd got home that tea and cakes were available after the race - I had to make do with a trip to Sainsburys
Date of review: March 27, 2006
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
