Bedford Harriers Oakley 12 & 20Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (458 votes). | 1 to 10 of 19 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture 2005 (19 votes) | | Overall score | | 74% | | How many would do it again? | | 87% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 75% | | PB potential | | 57% | | Atmosphere | | 67% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 74% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 57% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: smcc1879
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Good race, but plase sort out the showers. In full: Some hot water for the later finishers would be nice. Date of review: January 11, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: a.k.a "billy"
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Can we please have a medal or t-shirt next year and not a rubbish glass In full: Well marshalled, perfect running weather this race continues to be a great prep race prior to spring marathons. Date of review: March 23, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: PieNapper
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Good well organised race, Didn't like turning right angles on grass after 20 miles of gently curving tarmac tho. But a great measure of how the marathon training is going. Date of review: March 23, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Nicola Fleming 3
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Really enjoyed this well organised event - well done! Date of review: March 22, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Twisted
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Was struggling with a bad back so only completed 12 miles, I found the course OK, but thought there was a bit too much traffic on it to be ideal Date of review: March 22, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Blobsie
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: My beef - ruddy COLD showers! In full: Nice race - it would have been good to know before hand of the complexities of the last quarter mile trhough the houses. I wasn't ready for that lap on grass! Date of review: March 21, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: godspeed
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised, pre-London pace race. In full: This was my first 20 mile race and what a good start. It was well organised from the arrival to the start of the race. The marshals were excellent, all the way round they were supporting the runners and keeping us in check. The route was quite hilly but enjoyable with good mile markers, except for the last which was a killer, to see so close to the school. All in all a very enjoyable race which can only be a credit to the club. Date of review: March 21, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Helen Birnie
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A good practice run for the London marathon. Date of review: March 21, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Bazza B
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Excellent as long as you like challenging hills! In full: I did the 12 mile race and enjoyed it (despite the hills!). Most of the runners were doing the 20 mile race, presumably as a warm up for the London Marathon. My only gripe would be, for next year, to sort all the runners at the start into time order. Date of review: March 21, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: MP3
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good 20 mile prep. for marathon In full: Undulating course adding up to a great workout for spring marathon...certainly beats the normal long run! Support was good and the route was pleasant (when I wasnt looking at the floor thinking how many more miles!!) Rounding the corner heading towards the school and seeing the 19 mile marker was a heart breaker. Overall a well organised challenging event. Date of review: March 21, 2005
|

| |