Fitness First Bournemouth Bay Half-MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race (216 votes). | 1 to 10 of 30 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
| The big picture 2006 (30 votes) | | Overall score | | 79% | | How many would do it again? | | 90% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 87% | | PB potential | | 69% | | Atmosphere | | 68% | | Organisation | | 62% | | Value | | 69% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 69% |
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: anna fitzsimmons
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: the most expensive race i have entered in the area and two out of three water stations had no water Date of review: April 30, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Richard Harker
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well i set a PB!! Date of review: April 13, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Doozer.
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: a good race along one of the best sretches of beach in england. Only thing I was disappointed with was the offical timings system being up to half a minute from actual race time and the storage facility on the bus Date of review: April 11, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: gem26
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Doesn't disaapoint. Please cancel wind next time. Date of review: April 5, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Neil Massie
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: great start to half marathons Date of review: April 4, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: robertblock@btinternet.com
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good race, shame about the wind! Date of review: April 4, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Polly Pain
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: hard wind in your face on the return journey to the finish. Date of review: April 4, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Spencer Burnell
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Great scenery, good course but poor organisation. Too many races in the same place, badly run water stations and the minor roads should be closed. The wind and hills in the lst 4 miles were tough but the atmosphere was good and overall worth doing. Date of review: April 3, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: The Doc
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: First class. A very special thanks to the Marshalls. In full: First 8-9 miles great, then the wind came and it made an easy, flat course, feel like an uphill struggle. Wouldn't have missed it for anything. Very enjoyable, roll on next year. Date of review: April 3, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Craig Brown 6
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: ok Date of review: April 3, 2006
|

| |