Gloucester 20Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (137 votes). | 1 to 10 of 15 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture 2005 (15 votes) | | Overall score | | 89% | | How many would do it again? | | 93% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 77% | | PB potential | | 71% | | Atmosphere | | 63% | | Organisation | | 84% | | Value | | 85% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 64% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Unicorn
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Finish seems a long way from the car park! Date of review: March 15, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Ace_Racer
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised. Interesting course, great value. In full: Easy to park. Changing & toilets (no showers). No check in for bags but village hall was manned at all times. Great course. Very well organised and great value including a quality T shirt. Refreshments - I had tea, ham roll and fruit cake all for £1.30, fantastic!!! Great event would def do it again. Was very sore after but that's not their fault! ;-) Date of review: March 9, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: j-lard
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice route, good organisation. Date of review: March 9, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: LRP
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: No hassle 20 miles, low key but well organised. A clock at the finish would be good for those of us who don't have fancy watches! Date of review: March 8, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: J-ache
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Good organisation throughout. Fantastic course. Great timing for a spring marathon. Sparse support on a rural course by what there was was first class (especially the guy who kept turning up here, there and everywhere!). Date of review: March 7, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Crucial Carp
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Seamless organisation. Good course (except for odd idiot driver ignoring race warning signs) In full: Enjoyed walk to HQ from race finish for warming down. Scenic course with enough bends and undulations to make the route interesting. Friendly and helpful marshalls. Date of review: March 7, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Flashspread
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% |
In short: All aspects fully organised. Excellent In full: Post-race, the tea queue took a little while, and traffic seemed a little stressful for early leavers. Prize giver could use a microphone. These being the only minor niggles, it was a lovely occasion. Date of review: March 7, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: top banana
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice rural and mostly flat couse. In full: Excellent all round. The only gripe being the distance from the finish line back to race HQ. Did the 10 earlier in the year over the same(ish) course and will do both again. Well done Gloucester AC Date of review: March 7, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: echo
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Excellent FLM tester, scenic course, great organisation In full: Really enjoyable event - thanks Gloucester AC Date of review: March 7, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: roo2
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 20% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: OW! Date of review: March 7, 2005
|

| |