Welcome to Runner's World
Why should I become a member?
  •  
  • HOME
  • EVENTS
  • BLOGS
  • TRAINING
  • HEALTH
  • GEAR
  • ROUTES
  • FORUMS
  • STORE
  • TRIATHLETE'S WORLD
Subscribe | Olympics | Women's Running | ASICS Target 26.2 | Runner's World TV | Books | Travel
EVENTS
You are looking at: Home : EVENTS :

Events

denotes Subscriber-only content |
The H30 Pro Castle Combe 10K   Enter this event online.

Here's how RW members rated this race (182 votes).

1 to 10 of 30 ratingsPage: 1  2  3  

The big picture 2009 (30 votes)
Overall score
 
74%
How many would do it again?
 
93%
 
Details:
Scenery
 
55%
PB potential
 
83%
Atmosphere
 
61%
Organisation
 
77%
Value
 
70%
Beginner-friendliness
 
72%
Or view by year
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2000
All years
 

2009 race reviewed by: Len Pearce
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Pretty flat with a good promise of a pb.
Date of review: February 1, 2010

Report this rating to the moderator

2009 race reviewed by: Simondee
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
40%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: Rain paused just long enough to get us round. Fast but still challenging. Great opportunity for a 'year's best'.
Date of review: November 24, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

2009 race reviewed by: Slagathore
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Nice and easy. Will hopefully do the whole series next year.
Date of review: November 23, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

2009 race reviewed by: Gareth Holme
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
60%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Fast course, 3 laps not as boring as it sounds
In full: Well organised, car park right next to the race HQ mean i could be on the road a matter of minutes after finishing. The wind made the race interesting, but it is definitely a PB-potential course.
Date of review: November 23, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

2009 race reviewed by: Libbylaird
Overall score
 
80%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
80%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
80%
Beginner-friendliness
 
60%

In short: Weather was interesting and certainly blew away the cobwebs! Excellent organisation, very friendly. Managed a massive PB, so well worth the trip! See you in February!
Date of review: November 23, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

2009 race reviewed by: willwhitmore
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:

In short: Sorry about the toilets.
In full: Getting a lot of comments about the toilets and just wanted to apologise. As organsiers, it was totally out of our hands - we were informed at 5pm the night before that the main toilets were closed for refurbishment. We had one set up open behind the cafe and another set were opened at 10am plus the ones in the cafe. Unfortunately the cafe toilets then got blocked too.
The main toilet block will be refurbished ready for the February Chilly, but that was of no comfort yesterday I know.
Date of review: November 23, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

2009 race reviewed by: Majors
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
100%
Atmosphere
 
40%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: PB course when not windy. No more, no less
In full: I have given the PB 100% as this is what it would be on a calm day. Strange but strangely enjoyable running round a race track (OK - who had car noises in their head) Yes it could be boring but it's only 3 laps, Would be far worse on a shorter circuit. Minor gripe - Chip collection could have had a few more helping hands although they did vary registration times to keep queues down. 1 toilet block open was a joke. Iwas led to believe that another one did open later. In all fairness I will hold back on my judgement of the organisers for this as this may have been the responsibility of the race track owners. Were they aware of numbers involved?
Date of review: November 23, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

2009 race reviewed by: Star39
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
20%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
40%
Beginner-friendliness
 
40%

In short: A Little unorganised, plus more loos needed
In full: A good run with PB potential apart from the wind at the far end of the track!
Date of review: November 22, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

2009 race reviewed by: Steve Pemberton
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Maybe
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
60%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
40%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Generally good, with one major issue
In full: Let's start with the good bits. In general this is a really good event, well organised and efficient. Running on a racetrack was a novelty.
Normally I have no time for runners who moan aboput a lack of toilets, and think that they'd be better off directing their energies towards getting there in reasonable time. However, when you're travelling for an hour to the race 'coordinating' bodily functions is hit and miss, and provision is needed. In summary, there was ONE toilet for the 150 odd blokes in the race (badly signed too, with several 'false' signs). As a result I endured a massively uncomfortable last 3km where I had to virtually walk and any hope of a decent time disappeared.
This isn't an excuse - my own lack of fitness was the main reason for a disappointing time. However, such complete lack of provision is simply not good enough, especially at a circuit like this where facilities should have been plentiful
Date of review: November 22, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

2009 race reviewed by: DANIEL Ashe
Overall score
 
60%
Would you do it again?
 
Yes
 
Details:
Scenery
 
60%
PB potential
 
80%
Atmosphere
 
60%
Organisation
 
80%
Value
 
60%
Beginner-friendliness
 
80%

In short: Head wind prevented a pb run! (That's my excuse and I'm sticking to itt)
In full: Good organisation. Shame about the wind. It was the only negitive on the day. Everything else went smoothly!!
Date of review: November 22, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

 
Page: 1  2  3  
Spacer image

  • Trailblazer Clumber Park in pictures
  • Take a breather (Preview)
  • Take a breather
  • TRX for runners
  • The lowdown on sports massage
  • Women's guide to nutrition
  • Personal Best awards 2013
  • Minestrone with spring vegetables
  • Make mine a double
  • How fast should I run?
: Start Fitness- Use code RUN5 for extra 5% OFF
ah... achilles heel
Millet Sports
Runners Need
Sportsshoes.com - up to 70% off
Facebook

Visit the official Runner's World page

Twitter

Follow Runner's World on Twitter

Subscribe to Runner's World

Click here

Subscribe to Triathlete's World

Click here

Other Natmag-Rodale Sites

  • Triathlete's World
  • Fetcheveryone.com
  • Men's Health UK

Membership

  • Join Runner's World
  • Why should I join?
  • Forgotten password

Competitions

Shopping

Run For Charity

Injury Clinics

About Runner's World

  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & conditions

Reviews

  • Shoes
  • Clothing
  • Nutrition
  • Electronics

Health

  • Nutrition
  • Weight Loss
  • Beating Injury
  • Staying Healthy

Events

  • Find An Event
  • Add An Event
  • Manage My events
  • International Events
  • Travel Collection
  • Event Editorial

Training

  • Beginners
  • Training Plans
  • Racing
  • Motivation
  • Women's Running

Home

Forums

  • General
  • Beginners
  • Training
  • Health + Injury
  • Gear
  • Events
  • Clubhouse
  • Virgin London Marathon
  • Ultra/Adventure Racing
  • Triathlon
Website powered by: Magicalia | © Runner's World 2002-2013