The H30 Pro Castle Combe 10K  Here's how RW members rated this race (182 votes). | 1 to 10 of 30 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
| The big picture 2009 (30 votes) | | Overall score | | 74% | | How many would do it again? | | 93% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 55% | | PB potential | | 83% | | Atmosphere | | 61% | | Organisation | | 77% | | Value | | 70% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 72% |
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: Len Pearce
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Pretty flat with a good promise of a pb. Date of review: February 1, 2010
|
2009 race reviewed by: Simondee
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Rain paused just long enough to get us round. Fast but still challenging. Great opportunity for a 'year's best'. Date of review: November 24, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Slagathore
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice and easy. Will hopefully do the whole series next year. Date of review: November 23, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Gareth Holme
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fast course, 3 laps not as boring as it sounds In full: Well organised, car park right next to the race HQ mean i could be on the road a matter of minutes after finishing. The wind made the race interesting, but it is definitely a PB-potential course. Date of review: November 23, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Libbylaird
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Weather was interesting and certainly blew away the cobwebs! Excellent organisation, very friendly. Managed a massive PB, so well worth the trip! See you in February! Date of review: November 23, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: willwhitmore
 | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: |
In short: Sorry about the toilets. In full: Getting a lot of comments about the toilets and just wanted to apologise. As organsiers, it was totally out of our hands - we were informed at 5pm the night before that the main toilets were closed for refurbishment. We had one set up open behind the cafe and another set were opened at 10am plus the ones in the cafe. Unfortunately the cafe toilets then got blocked too. The main toilet block will be refurbished ready for the February Chilly, but that was of no comfort yesterday I know. Date of review: November 23, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Majors
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: PB course when not windy. No more, no less In full: I have given the PB 100% as this is what it would be on a calm day. Strange but strangely enjoyable running round a race track (OK - who had car noises in their head) Yes it could be boring but it's only 3 laps, Would be far worse on a shorter circuit. Minor gripe - Chip collection could have had a few more helping hands although they did vary registration times to keep queues down. 1 toilet block open was a joke. Iwas led to believe that another one did open later. In all fairness I will hold back on my judgement of the organisers for this as this may have been the responsibility of the race track owners. Were they aware of numbers involved? Date of review: November 23, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Star39
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 20% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: A Little unorganised, plus more loos needed In full: A good run with PB potential apart from the wind at the far end of the track! Date of review: November 22, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Steve Pemberton
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Generally good, with one major issue In full: Let's start with the good bits. In general this is a really good event, well organised and efficient. Running on a racetrack was a novelty. Normally I have no time for runners who moan aboput a lack of toilets, and think that they'd be better off directing their energies towards getting there in reasonable time. However, when you're travelling for an hour to the race 'coordinating' bodily functions is hit and miss, and provision is needed. In summary, there was ONE toilet for the 150 odd blokes in the race (badly signed too, with several 'false' signs). As a result I endured a massively uncomfortable last 3km where I had to virtually walk and any hope of a decent time disappeared. This isn't an excuse - my own lack of fitness was the main reason for a disappointing time. However, such complete lack of provision is simply not good enough, especially at a circuit like this where facilities should have been plentiful Date of review: November 22, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: DANIEL Ashe
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Head wind prevented a pb run! (That's my excuse and I'm sticking to itt) In full: Good organisation. Shame about the wind. It was the only negitive on the day. Everything else went smoothly!! Date of review: November 22, 2009
|

| |