Reedham TenHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (64 votes). | 1 to 10 of 26 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
| The big picture 2009 (26 votes) | | Overall score | | 88% | | How many would do it again? | | 98% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 78% | | PB potential | | 68% | | Atmosphere | | 69% | | Organisation | | 86% | | Value | | 82% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 71% |
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: Mark Colman
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A good well organised race despite the wind and cold
In full: A good ten miler to add to the race calendar. Very well organised and marshalled despite the very cold wind.
The course was good and varied and seemed to be a well attended event.
Date of review: February 7, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: jfdrake
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Biting winds but loved it all the same
In full: Even though I trotted along the road to warm up, for the first mile my legs and feet were on automatic pilot, it was so chilly. The course was great, the marshalls fab and I was pleased with myself, the first long run since last October's Lewes Downland in howling gales and side swiping rain. Anyway, who says Norfolk is flat!
Date of review: February 6, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Chris Haycock
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Biting wind, snow showers, sooo cold, but lovely course, with ups and downs and great organisation
In full: It was a hardy group that turned out on a freezing cold day, with a strong and bitter east wind and snow showers, but what a great run. Well organised, plenty of marshals (and what a great job they did, standing around for several hours in those temperatures - thanks guys), good memento. Plenty of undulations, but nothing too taxing and the sun came out for some of the time at least. I'll be back next year.
Date of review: February 4, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Simon Brierley
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good early season training run
In full: I am training for Ironman and it fitted in really well with my miles for the week. I was able to settle into good pace and did not feel that I was pressed to join the front runners. Own pace 6:58min/mile finished in 1:09:54 very happy
Date of review: February 3, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Paul Arnold
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Tough but fun
In full: Good race with freindly marshalls, well organised.
How the hell some of you lot managed personal bests is beyond me. Every hill only seemed to go up and the wind was relentless.
Good fun though. See u next year.
Date of review: February 3, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Ian Jarvis 5
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised Race
In full: Apart from a very cold wind the Marshalls were full of encouragement and the course was good with some geat views over the feilds.Will be back next year - less wind please
Date of review: February 3, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Matt Howes
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Lots of marshalls and plenty of encouragement. Would definitely do it againn
Date of review: February 3, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Ben Russell 4
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: really good a few moretoile
Date of review: February 2, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Puffin Billy
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent organisatio. Thanks to the happy marshalls for all the encouragement on a truly cold and windy day. Well done. Word will get around this is a great race.
Date of review: February 2, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Louise Juby
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Excellent organisation. Friendly and encoraging marshalls. Would definately do it again
Date of review: February 2, 2009
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
