The Sleaford 1/2MHere's how RW members rated this race (288 votes). | 1 to 10 of 52 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
| The big picture 2009 (52 votes) | | Overall score | | 80% | | How many would do it again? | | 94% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 74% | | PB potential | | 63% | | Atmosphere | | 70% | | Organisation | | 83% | | Value | | 82% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 72% |
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: Addick Gal
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Well organised, friendly and challenging
In full: My third half, the previous two having been specifically chosen because they included that magic word "flat" so for me this was a bit more challenging esp with the off rod section. But I got a PB by over 4 mins, the marshalls were excellent, the mile markers accurate and overall the race was very well organised. From club colleagues I understand that even the weather conditions were better than previous years. Well done Striders.
Date of review: February 28, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: skip-kat
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: most enjoyable
Date of review: February 26, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Eleanor Amos
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very friendly, well organised, beautiful route - horrible hill at end
In full: This was my first half marathon and I really enjoyed it. The marshals were full of support and they were very encouraging. The last hill came as a bit of a shock to the system as this was not mentioned on the write up but I kept going and made it to the end. Even though I was towards the end I was very impressed by the number of people at the end to welcome us in.
I would do it again – even with the 7 mile round trip to get there and would recommend it to any beginner.
Date of review: February 24, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: RICHARD EMARTON 2
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised and run. Above average goody bag. A very friendly atmosphere.
Date of review: February 24, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: The Joggler
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A challenging and enjoyable race
In full: As a countryside born lad (where's my pitchfork Jethro!) I much prefer to run along country lanes and tracks than through city centres. So this half marathon was ideal for me.
The Viking Way was tough - what with all the travelling, pillaging and the locals firing arrows at you. The roads were undulating and a few hills here and there got the heart pumping a bit more.
The marshalls were superb (they live at number 16 by the way and do a mean Sunday roast). Seriously though I thought it was superbly organised and many thanks to all the organisers and volunteers.
Well done on finishing Bronwyn - and yes I managed to sneak in just under 2 hours - next year I'm going for the win :)
Date of review: February 23, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Duncan Stewart 2
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: The 'green mile' adds some character at the start, the 'hills' keep it interesting in the middle but I wanted it over by the 10 mile mark.! However, the marshals were helpful and encouraging and the finish line is impressive.
Date of review: February 23, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: For My Light
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A well organised Race
In full: More challenging than I remembered from the previous year, but some fabulous encouragement from the marshalls on course. Thank you and well done Striders
Date of review: February 23, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: karen Hewitt
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A Great Race for Everyone - excellently organised. Really good facilities so could take your family along to watch. I had a great day despite the aches and pains today!! Thanks to all
Date of review: February 23, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Soon Yee Liew
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: good
Date of review: February 23, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Matt Rowley
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Really enjoyable.
Date of review: February 23, 2009
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
