Wheathampstead 10KHere's how RW members rated this race (132 votes). | The big picture (132 votes) | | Overall score | | 82% | | How many would do it again? | | 94% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 86% | | PB potential | | 55% | | Atmosphere | | 73% | | Organisation | | 69% | | Value | | 73% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 73% |
|
|
2012 race reviewed by: Aizxana
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great off road race, quite hilly
In full: Enjoyable race mostly on towpaths, cycle tracks and trails. Certainly more cross country than road - so muddy and a fair few hills.
Friendly and helpful marshals.
Banana, snack and drinks at the end, also food and drinks available to buy too.
Good location although we did have trouble finding the right car park as couldn't see any marshals in the car park.
Good value local race, will do this again.
Date of review: November 30, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Ruth Pickering 2
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: May 24, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Paul Davies UK
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good Race for 1st 10K
In full: This was my first ever competitive 10K race so I was quite apprehensive about it.
The start line is a short walk away from the playing fields in a narrow lane. A nice touch was the markers as to where to stand depending on what times you post for 10K. A little bit of other racers "bumping" into me to get past even before the race had started but I presumed thats the norm for a race.
The course has a few bottlenecks that previous reviews have commented on - the kissing gate, some steep downhill steps and a small bridge near the end that is only wide enough for one person at a time. Water station at the 5K mark, though it was impossible to drink out of a plastic cup whilst running!
I was surprised how hilly the course was (80m elevation gain)and it was shorter than the advertised 10K(9.82km).
Medal, banana and bottle of water at the finish line was a nice touch also.
Overall a nice race as a starter for someone new to 10K races.
Date of review: May 23, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: RosRunner
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: PB highly unlikely - and all for the wrong reasons!
In full: Unless you start out at the front of this course, you'll be caught in at least 3 bottlenecks - one before a kissing gate and two before some (steep) downward steps. I had about 20 folks queuing in front of me 3 times, we were all standing still for 15-20 seconds each time. Bye bye PB and hello cramp. Also the track is narrow in many places so you can't overtake when you need to. Nearly came cropper.
Terrain is rough underfoot so watch your ankles. In fact you spend so much time looking down the scenery is neither here nor there. I know the organisers rave about the beauty of the countryside on the route but IMHO it's nothing special... Green and rural yes but overall this run feels cramped and claustrophobic.
Water station at 5k? Might as well not have bothered - please use bottles instead, plastic cups are impossible to drink from on the move! Or provide a space to stop/slow down by the water tables, it was too narrow. Or put the water stations near the 3 bottlenecks so at least we can rehydrate while we're standing still.
No baggage deposit - a definite negative - lots of freezing cold runners as we had to leave jackets etc in the car. With the 20 minute walk to the start line there were lots of chattering jaws and cold muscles.
Car parking was already full when we got there so we squeezed in on the side of the road - a 10 minute walk away. There was a long and cold queue for the Portaloos even though there were about 10 of them. More for next year perhaps?
A fair few inclines on the route - in fact it seemed like one long climb with 2/3 sharp descents/steps.
Seemed to be a good event for families, 2k, lots of kids around, bouncy castle, burgers etc.
Medal, water and bananas on finishing. Nice touch having prizes for 200th and 400th position but goodies for all would be better.
I might consider this one again but it's not a race I enjoyed much. As you can tell.
Positives: timing chips worked well and the signs at the start allowing you to get into position according to your estimated finish time.
Date of review: May 21, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: jammydodger101
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: not a 10k and never has been (but alot of fun!)
In full: Great cross-country 10k BUT..This is shorter than the 2011 course by 100m. It actually measures 9.71 km not 10k. My watch said it, the mapmyrun shows it (http://www.mapmyrun.com/routes/view/94597881/?open_ive_done=1&new_route=1) and others observed it like naturalbornrunner. If I want to compare with 2011 times I must add 23s to my time given my pace. If I want to compare it to all my 10k, I must at 1.07 mins to my time to know if this was a PB. It wasn't but I had a lot of fun, so thanks Wheathamstead.
To organisers: Nice day out but please get the course measured properly. You need an extra 300m somewhere.
Date of review: May 21, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Darren Knight 4
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great local race. more cross country than road race
In full: Had a great day the kids 2k was enjoyable as i took my soon for the first time. the 10K is challenging and has alot of off road and uneven tracks which worried me as I have problems with my ankles taking away slightl;y from the views. I will definatley go back next year though.
Date of review: May 21, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Natural Born Runner
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: I am surprised it is only at 54% for PB potential
In full: the bottlenecks were a small issue (luckily I didn't have to queue for long), organisation perfect, the hamburger was delicious!
The only thing I am puzzled with is that PB potential. My garmin measured it as 9.7k. Mostly because of that I managed to beat my PB (set last Sunday on arguably easier route) by 1:22 mins, is this route 10km long really?
Date of review: May 21, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: RichardW
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Well organised and very friendly...but there were a couple of problems
In full: Having to queue to go down the stairs and through the gate was frustrating. The 2k marker was well out of place as I did 6:38 and then 4:00...which works out to be an average of 5:19 and that's nearer the truth.
Nevertheless, a great race and I'll certainly be back next year.
Date of review: May 20, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: andrea walker 6
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Lovely race entirely off road, quite hilly, very popular. Good family atmosphere. One for the diary 2013
Date of review: May 20, 2012
|
2011 race reviewed by: JazzyDog
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Good as a challenging but low key introduction to 10k
In full: Cooler conditions than last year made for a better run. Using an old railway footpath and farm tracks, this is more of a cross-country run than your usual 10k. The playful course has some bottlenecks and seems to have a number of long uphills with just a few short downhills, but the scenery, chip to chip timing and the family friendliness of the event win through. Note that the 10k doesn't begin in the same place as the 2k family race so allow 10 minutes for the walk to the start.
Date of review: May 25, 2011
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
