Auckland Castle 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (6 votes). | 1 to 6 of 6 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture (6 votes) | | Overall score | | 90% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 67% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 73% | | Organisation | | 90% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 63% |
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: sean lee
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great run for preparing for the Great North Run Date of review: November 13, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Bill Ferguson
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: This very friendly event deserves support In full: First time at this event, I understand that it used to bring in elite runners and attract a large field and that this was the relaunch as a new, less slimmed down event. Even so , a good 350 plus runners turned up and enjoyed excellent support from a large number of very enthusiastic marshals. The event retains a lot of good, local sponsors and dserves to continue to succeed, even without the big names. THe course is not the most wonderful in the world involving a lot of short climbs and a two lap run round the town centre , including the entry road to the local Morrisons. The section through the Bishop of Durham's palasce makes up somewhat. On a challenging route, even after a fall in the first 200 metres , I still managed a time between 42 & 43 minutes - forgot to check my watch on crossing the line. Date of review: August 7, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Jon Rose 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: I'll see you next year - hopefully another PB In full: First time for me and was surprised at the good turn out. Really enjoyed it, knocked 3 minutes off my PB and best of all beat my mate for the first time!! Date of review: August 7, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Durham Dawdler
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: enjoyable In full: I managed a PB despite tripping over a discarded water bottle at the end of the first lap and aggravating my ankle injury. The organisation of this race is excellent, all the marshalls were cheerful and encouraging, even the police were egging the runners on which I thought was great. Race started dead on time and everything went like clockwork. Date of review: August 6, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: Beagle
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great location, organisation and a good depth to the field Date of review: January 16, 2006
|
2004 race reviewed by: Mike Jefferies
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Not one for PB's but a great atmosphere and a chance to run with some quality elite athletes - or at least stand on the start line with them! Nice finish at the castle. Date of review: August 31, 2005
|

| |