Chichester Priory 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (21 votes). | 1 to 10 of 21 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
| The big picture (21 votes) | | Overall score | | 79% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 70% | | PB potential | | 79% | | Atmosphere | | 68% | | Organisation | | 77% | | Value | | 71% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 70% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Prue Blamey
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: I enyoyed this one In full: Just wasn't sure where the start line was Date of review: March 23, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: ginjaninja
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great race, well organised, well marshalled. "Hills" were not severe, more like gentle slopes. Nice to have 2K downhill. Good facilities, see you next year!! Date of review: February 14, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Tony Thurgood
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Beat my last 10k time by over 6 minutes...so it was good for me! Date of review: February 11, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: medic one
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: well done to all In full: well this is my second time that i have done the Chichester Race and it won't be the last. Date of review: February 7, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Snuffles
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Brilliantly organised, nice mug, great weather and a PB! Date of review: February 7, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Roderick Nairn
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A quick course. Good atmosphere Date of review: February 7, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Skip
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good organisation, fast, worth the trip In full: Undulating course but still fast. Well organised start, well marshalled route, good facilities. The organisers have got all the essentials right - many races could learn something from this one. Date of review: February 7, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Tim Cooke 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised, and good fast course. Date of review: February 7, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: black rat
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: well organised In full: Plently of parking space available with toilets close by which had no queues. tannoy announcements and time bands at the beginning which was well organised. It was a fairly flat course which a few slight inclines but overall very well organised and enjoyable. Date of review: February 7, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: W.H
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: fast finish last 2 k downhill Date of review: February 6, 2005
|

| |