Snake Lane 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (17 votes). | 1 to 10 of 17 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture (17 votes) | | Overall score | | 84% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 78% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 73% | | Organisation | | 78% | | Value | | 81% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 74% |
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: Paul Sheridan 4
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good marshalling, nice flat route, lovely mug for finishing, all the ingredients for a pb which i did , knocking nearly 4 mins off my previous best. will definately do again. afterall i am a pock runner.
Date of review: March 2, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: DarkFishCake
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Spot on, good scenery, pretty flat, can;t find fault except for the finish, as I actually stopped running and had to ask where it was.
Date of review: February 28, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Number 29
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Definate PB potential especially as other local 10m runs tend to be hilly
In full: Yeah so it wasn't clear where the finish line was, but from where i run a couple of seconds here or there are not going to ruin my day. Some pointer of the direction back to race HQ would have been useful, I went with the flow and jst hoped that they had got into the car park as well.
Generally well organised with good and friendly marshalls, well done to Pocklington Runners
Date of review: February 27, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Barnsley Runner
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% |
In short: Get down to brass tacks - it's good value, flat and a good vibe
In full: Right - scenery? Well I'd drive round the `Pocklington Scenic Drive' if that was important.
It was well organised and marshalled. Oh dear if you had to walk 1/2 mile to the start. Include it in your warm up then.
At the end I found asking the question `which way is it back to race HQ' quite useful for finding my way back to the car.
Never done this before but this is a top top race.
There was a query about the accuracy of mile markers around mile 5. Any observations?
Otherwise A1 stuff from Pocklington RR. Well done!
Date of review: February 26, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: NorthernExile
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Not a bad race, but chaotic getting to the start and a bit messy at the end. Lots of confusion as to where the clock actually stopped! That said, it's a nice course with no really nasty hills so there is PB potential there.
Date of review: February 26, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Bomble Boo
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very quick and a nice commemorative mug at the end
Date of review: February 26, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: simon franklin 2
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great fast friendly race
In full: Good views, very fair course and great organisation. My first 10 miler, and hope it will be my second next year.
Date of review: February 26, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Sue C
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: well organised, flatish race,
In full: lots of encouraging marshalls, nice scenic route down quiet country lanes, well organised. Nice mug at the end of the race. Flatish, good for beginners.
Date of review: February 26, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: beders (oldtimer)
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: well organised fast PB route
In full: great running conditions, fast route, plenty of marshalls with a nice mug at the end. New PB by over 4 mins so definitely in the diary for next year
Date of review: February 26, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: Lee G
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice flat course, good scenery, great atmosphere and a nice mug to sip your Lemsip out of after the cold and snow have got to you.
Date of review: February 21, 2005
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
