The Lung Run 10k RaceHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (24 votes). | 1 to 10 of 24 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
| The big picture (24 votes) | | Overall score | | 82% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 85% | | PB potential | | 59% | | Atmosphere | | 73% | | Organisation | | 71% | | Value | | 75% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 77% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: Mr Eers
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: well organised and great fun Date of review: May 29, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: meep meep
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Enjoyable Date of review: May 14, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Nic Nic
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: First 10 K and enjoyed it, not sure on my time need await results. Cardiac Hill was the hardest part of the run. Date of review: April 28, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by:
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Well organised, well supported all the way around, very enjoyable! In full: Lovely course through Sutton Park, all different abilities, easy to get too, We will be back. Date of review: April 27, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: R D Runner
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A great race....Good PB Potential Date of review: April 25, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: The Pillock In Combats
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Nice atmosphere Date of review: April 25, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: LJB1
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: First 10k so PB potential not applicable - happy to get round, and I did. Terrain a little hillier than expected - but challenging at the same time. Date of review: April 25, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Paul Mullen 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Lovely weather in lovely surroundings. Would have been nice to have a couple more water stations especially on a warm day. Overall, most enjoyable and good value, will be back next year Date of review: April 25, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Tim Gould
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Superb day In full: Weather was perfect, race was great and I ran a best ever PB at 47.38 (to be confirmed!)...what more can I ask for? I'd missed this event for a few years, so the 10k course had been changed, but I have to say it is a massive improvement over the previous 'laps' that used to make up the event. Date of review: April 25, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Richard Varley
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Excellent day.... In full: Great organisation and a great day. Course was fair though the 2 parts where we had to double back were mentally painful. Too busy at the start as well leading to a really slow first few k's thus damaging overall time. Date of review: April 25, 2005
|

| |