Regents Park 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (16 votes). | 1 to 10 of 16 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture (16 votes) | | Overall score | | 78% | | How many would do it again? | | 88% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 76% | | PB potential | | 84% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 69% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 75% |
|
|
2007 race reviewed by: Jude O Neill
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Easy course in lovely setting, great to have the kms markers to monitor speed
Date of review: January 7, 2008
|
2006 race reviewed by: this
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: As a visitor, fabulous event. Great way to start the year.
In full: As a tourist in London for New Year's, this was a lovely event to take part in. The event was low key, very well organised and a fantastic way to see Regents Park. I would recommend it to anyone. A big thank you to all The marshalls.
Date of review: February 14, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Mike Clyne
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Excellently organised simple race
In full: Regents Park is one of those parts of London that can make you feel alive and well. The 3 lap course is now different to previous years but still remains as fast as before. The marshalling is efficient and friendly, the atmosphere is both competitive and relaxed. The race starts at 9.30 so you can be home for lunchtime.
For those who only like the Nike 10km type large event feel, this isn't for you.
Date of review: February 7, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: JO Boy
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great orginisation, fab scenery, great for a PB.
Date of review: January 4, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Felix Glenn
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Brilliant race!
In full: That wide boulavard straight down the back was awesome! - the gentle downhill gradient meant that everyone picked up their pace and flew down that stretch. Friendly marshalls, PB, a great start to 2006, thoroughly recommend it! See you next year - Felix
Date of review: January 2, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: dan meaney
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: flat, fast & friendly
In full: The race today was excellent. Regents Park is a superb venue. The marshalling was efficient as well as being friendly. The course lends itself to fast times even though winter weather conditions are bound to slightly intefere with this. A thoroughly good experience.
Date of review: January 2, 2006
|
2004 race reviewed by: Hehsus
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Easy
Date of review: January 1, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: a c 15
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: km markers woul be great.
Date of review: December 6, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: SW1
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: good course, nice atmosphere. just a shame whole series fills up so early
Date of review: November 10, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Frances Ngu
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: good race to do especially begineers
In full: distance markers were in miles. this should have been in kilometres since it is a 10km race.
Date of review: November 9, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
