Overall score		40%
Would you do it again?		No
Details:
Scenery		60%
Atmosphere		40%
Organisation		20%
Value		40%

In full: As previously pointed out, this was no way the full 5k, and there were no marshals at the only critical point (I was one of those that went the wrong way). All in all it was quite disappointing.
Date of review: November 6, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		100%
Organisation		80%
Value		100%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

Date of review: November 1, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		60%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		40%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

Date of review: October 28, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		40%
Would you do it again?		No
Details:
Scenery		40%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		40%
Organisation		40%
Value		20%
Beginner-friendliness		60%

In short: poor martialing, route not 5k, traffic on route even thoughon private grounds.
Date of review: October 26, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		60%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		60%
PB potential		80%
Atmosphere		60%
Organisation		40%
Value		40%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Let down by organisation, course not 5k
In full: This was a nice race for a good cause. Hopefully this review won't be taken the wrong way but I did feel it was a bit dis-organised. Some direction sign on the streets for people arriving would have been good. The leaders at the start of the race went the wrong way as no marshall to point it out or signs to point the way. I felt the traffic should have been stopped during the event. Probably my biggest concern was that the course didn't measure 5k, it was 4.2k. I was using this as a training run to get a measured race time so a bit disappointed to only see 4.2k on my computer. The results may be mis-leading, because it was laps people didn't complete the course (1 or 2 laps) however they were crossing the finish line and obviously showing a very fast time, so not really sure where I really came. A water station would have been personally welcomed on the course.

These are quite easy things to put right and I hope that this feedback is used to easily improve the event for next year.
Date of review: October 26, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator

Overall score		80%
Would you do it again?		Yes
Details:
Scenery		40%
PB potential		100%
Atmosphere		80%
Organisation		80%
Value		80%
Beginner-friendliness		80%

In short: Fun, well-organised event (apart from a brief confusion about the beginning of the route) - would definitely do it again - thanks!
Date of review: October 26, 2009

Report this rating to the moderator