Puma Kentmere Trail Race & Challenge 17KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (19 votes). | 1 to 10 of 19 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture (19 votes) | | Overall score | | 97% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 99% | | PB potential | | 46% | | Atmosphere | | 91% | | Organisation | | 83% | | Value | | 78% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 79% |
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: paulo campos
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: superb race - made me fall in love with running again!!! Scenery outstanding and a race which is hard as nails! Perfect combination In full: The scenery is worth the fee alone, it truly is a magnificent setting - such a privilege to be able to run in such a beautiful part of the country.
The event was very well organised and the camaraderie amongst the competitors was fantastic. The race was hard as nails, with several lung busting hilly sections and one crazy suicidal descent at the end, but the sense of achievement on completing it will last with you for many weeks. I'll definately be back next year and as a result of this one race I've signed up for the rest of the series!
A favourite by a long way!!! Date of review: July 13, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: jamanson
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: June 19, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Dave Vaughan
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Like hitting your head with a hammer. It feels ace when it's over Date of review: June 13, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: shufflebottom
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great Race - even if I did land in the only bog head first! In full: Hot, hard, and probably lovely scenery (too busy looking at the ground to see it..) Roads congested on arival (nearly missed the fun trails), but otherwise smooth operation. Loved the live music at the end - great to soak up the sunshine, relaxing with the family and listening to nice tunes - and the drummers are a brilliant way of getting revved up too! If I can forget the pain I'll be back! Date of review: June 11, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: runningfluff
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A race for everyone! In full: I live in the Lakes so am lucky to be able to run on and around these mountains week in week out, but what I really love is how us middle-of-the-packers get to congratulate the winners as they leg it past us and how even the fastest are stopping to do Usain Bolt poses or even take photos! A great atmosphere and especially perfect for first time off-roaders. Date of review: June 11, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: anna mason 4
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: June 11, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: ian hughes 6
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Really enjoyed this race, would recommend it to anyone, Date of review: June 9, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Tom Purcell
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Loved it (though it hurt). I will be back! In full: I am still very new to running, but in my limited experience I do think people have been a bit generous regarding organisation. Nothing was signposed very well at the event from the registration tent, to coursemarkers, to the water tent at the finish of the race. In truth I found this a bit frustrating and, though it was the only area for improvement as far as I am concerned, I just thought it was worth mentioning. Date of review: June 9, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: J Moyer
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Stunning scenery brill organisation all ages and abilities feel at home In full: It would be challenging to find anywhere more rewarding in England to trail run-the scenery is breathtaking especially when bathed in sun! The organisation is brilliant with updates and newsletters. Date of review: June 7, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Phil Noble
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Fantastic scenery and a great atmosphere In full: I thoroghly enjoyed this, a really hard workout on a challenging but stunning course. The last two or three kilometers were really hard work, but that just made this a more rewarding achievement overall for me. I'd certainly like to have another go next year. Date of review: June 7, 2010
|

| |