Wibbly Wobbly Log Jog 5Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (56 votes). | 1 to 10 of 56 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
| The big picture (56 votes) | | Overall score | | 95% | | How many would do it again? | | 97% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 90% | | PB potential | | 61% | | Atmosphere | | 87% | | Organisation | | 91% | | Value | | 91% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: Claire Wylie
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Brilliant run through beautiful scenery, with a good atmosphere too
Date of review: August 22, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: darrellt
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Beautiful place, exceptionally friendly runners and organisers.
In full: The Forestry Commission really need to appreciate the awareness of this beautiful location that this race promotes and support the organisers to ensure that it continues.
Date of review: June 13, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: stufie
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race would do again especially as i got a PB :-)
In full: Very flat (only one short rise to speak of). Plenty of water (every 2 miles) nice rucksac and cheap entry. No toilets (which we knew about) but plenty of trees. Supportive marshalls
Date of review: June 1, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Dave Rayment
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great location but lack of toilets before the race was a nightmare
Date of review: June 1, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Chris Bolton
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Lovely race, lovely marshals
Date of review: June 1, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Sharon Hurren 2
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In full: This is one of my favourite races, thought it was a really nice course even though it had been changed. Thankyou to the marshalls who are really friendly and a special thankyou to the lady with the jelly babies, a really nice touch and well appreciated, I will definitely be back next year.
Date of review: May 31, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: the gray one
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: course has changed pity this was a very good race
Date of review: May 31, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: maxine rodwell
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In full: lovely race,big thankyou to the lady with the jelly babies(they really helped).was nice for my family to be able to see me running through the woods,wish there was more water station and that you got a goodie bag with your prize after the race rather than before.nice little race in a great location.
Date of review: May 31, 2010
|
2009 race reviewed by: Rebecca Willcox 2
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: My first ever race & I simply loved every minute of it (all 51 of them actually!
In full: A bit nervous about how I would fair up against the pros - but everyone was so friendly and the forest was a perfect setting. I was finished before I realised just how far I had gone, the trail was so interesting it was just brilliant! I will definately be back next year - Thank you to Brandon Fern Hoppers!
Date of review: August 16, 2009
|
2008 race reviewed by: Nik Chapman
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In full: This race sits beautifully in the calender as a return to racing after the FLM. It is a rolling sympathetic course run in idyllic forest surroundings,traffic free, excellently marshalled and organised by arguably Britain's most fun and friendliest running club. A must for any runner who has forgotten why they run....
Date of review: May 27, 2009
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
