Kirklees 10k ChallengeHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (7 votes). | 1 to 7 of 7 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture (7 votes) | | Overall score | | 83% | | How many would do it again? | | 86% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 63% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 63% | | Value | | 74% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 74% |
|
|
2012 race reviewed by: Chris (the York one)
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: A run in sun - perfect. Congratulations to the organisers (Carlsberg in disguise?). One minor niggle - on-line entry not encrypted Date of review: May 26, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: dr worm
 | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: ejoyed this race toughest bit was at 5k small race narrow paths bet at least one person ends up in the canal at some point cant find any results though would like to know where i came. Date of review: May 26, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Adele Tayles
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised this year - much better start In full: It seems the organisers took on the feedback from last year and re-organised the start. It was a much better route as well. There didn't seem to be as many entrants as last year. All the marshalls and organisers were friendly and helpful. Would definately do it again next year and might even get another PB! Date of review: May 26, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Invisible Man
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good, well organised race In full: Runners called forward in 10 minute timebands so nobody should have started ahead of their abilities. Pretty flat and fast course except for the steps and steep path just after half way. Plentiful direction signs and marshalls. Canal towpath dry and firm in the hot weather although possibly treacherous in places if wet. One improvement would be the race numbers, mine dissolved within a couple of miles but otherwise a pleasant Saturday morning run. Date of review: May 26, 2012
|
2011 race reviewed by: Simon-J-Edwards
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Sort the Start Out. In full: Glorious Route spoiled by lack of organisation and not enough marshalls. I would put that down to it being a first time event. Re-Assured all my £10 went to the charity, but a poor starting area (you cannot have a true race starting on a canal tow path with 200 starters) and no real momento to speak of a massive let down. Get the start on St Thomas's next year, pay for a temp closure or a policeman or 2 and this race will be a gem, because once the field thins out the route is lovely. Date of review: May 22, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: mark williams 54
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Ready steady.... In full: ....go! The start was fun, a kind of pre race treasure hunt to find it! Nice route even with the sudden stone stairs after two or three km, and my certifictae time is much better than my garmin time, so naturally I'll be using that one! Date of review: May 21, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: michael gladstone
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great venue. Fairly quick with hard sections. More orgaisation and marshalls needed, good race, would do it again. Date of review: May 21, 2011
|

| |