Twickenham 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (13 votes). | 1 to 10 of 13 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture (13 votes) | | Overall score | | 86% | | How many would do it again? | | 92% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 86% | | PB potential | | 72% | | Atmosphere | | 69% | | Organisation | | 75% | | Value | | 75% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 78% |
|
|
2012 race reviewed by: Stephen Conlon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great race along the Thames
Date of review: January 4, 2013
|
2012 race reviewed by: Andrew Lawrence 5
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: First time 10k - loved it!!!
Date of review: December 14, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Stephen Noble 2
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great location
In full: It was a nice touch having bananas before the race however there are a few things that could have been better. There was a real lack of toilets and the pubs facilities couldnt cope. Some portaloos would be good next year. Also the first section of the race is quite tight so its tricky to over take. Perhaps starting the race on a different part of the course would help with this, and the toilet situation. There wasn't any water at the end of the race (that I could find). Not sure if this was in the goody bags that were stolen along side the medals though.
Lovely area though and feel sorry for the organisers having things stolen prior to the race.
Date of review: December 11, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: David Facer 2
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A friendly and well organised race
In full: A friendly and well organised race which was ran along a very pleasant route. Would definitely recommend and do it again.
Date of review: December 11, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Mr Andrew 3
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice and flat along the Thames, beautiful way to spend 40 minutes
In full: Lovely little looping flat course along the Thames. Well organised, nice to start and end at the pub, very social and friendly. Shame that the medals got stolen, they looked really good, would have been a nice addition to the collection, they really are some scumbags around
Date of review: December 11, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Antonio Coimbra
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: The race is just about the Thames and the scenery is very nice
Date of review: December 10, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Anton Menzies
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Lovely picturesque 10k
Date of review: December 9, 2012
|
2011 race reviewed by: Paul Devine
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Friendly and Fast
In full: A very well organised first time event. Apart from the slightly congested start, I have no complaints at all. It was a scenic and fast rote, and enjoyed the mud! Was also a nice touch that race times and positions were communicated at the end of the race.
Will definitely be back in 2012.
Date of review: October 31, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Greg Blomley
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Fantastic run on a well loved route.
In full: The organisation was fantastic and atmosphere great. Am looking forward to next year
Date of review: October 31, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: HAH
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised, friendly, scenic flat race. Will definitely return next year
Date of review: October 30, 2011
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
