Runners Need G3 March 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (3 votes). | 1 to 3 of 3 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture (3 votes) | | Overall score | | 100% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 93% | | PB potential | | 27% | | Atmosphere | | 87% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 73% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 73% |
|
|
2013 race reviewed by: The Other Man
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: As hard as they come
In full: Not a race to run for speed, with more ups and downs than a season of Eastenders, but a fabulous atmosphere, brilliant route and a serious test. I haven't run one of these for a couple of years but will not leave it so long next time, just brilliant. I have a theory that the field is mostly triathletes, which makes for a great atmosphere along the (entirely positive) lines of "we're just running, why are we doing this?" Whatever the reason, though, it's a great race.
Date of review: March 4, 2013
|
2013 race reviewed by: ADXC
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Tip top as always - a great way to spend a hour on Sat am!
Date of review: March 2, 2013
|
2012 race reviewed by: Dustboy
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very well designed XC. Hurt like hell.
In full: Potentially the best course yet. Evil fun. Top morning out.
Date of review: March 6, 2012
|
| 
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
