The Windsor Half MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (12 votes). | 1 to 10 of 12 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture (12 votes) | | Overall score | | 82% | | How many would do it again? | | 88% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 82% | | PB potential | | 52% | | Atmosphere | | 73% | | Organisation | | 72% | | Value | | 72% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 73% |
|
|
2007 race reviewed by: ANGIE WALKER
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great scenery but could be better organised In full: Plastic cups of water from water butts full of dirt and grass - hardly the Royal treatment and impossible to run with. Distance markers unclear due to the loop. It would have been better if they showed both distances. The medals are cheap a crap. Otherwise a good race on a surprisingly hot day. Date of review: October 6, 2008
|
2004 race reviewed by: Philippa Edward
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Some bits felt mountainous rather than undulating Date of review: February 4, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: Bella2
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: The term "undulating" had been cruelly advertised. Date of review: February 4, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: Long Distance Duckling
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: My first half marathon - will definitely be back next year Date of review: January 25, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: GreatNorthWood
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Fantastic - My first race of any kind - loved it. Date of review: January 24, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: Mike Wood 5
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Brilliant scenery,a little hilly,but can't complain running in the Queen's back garden.Very well organised,most enjoyable half marathon with no car fumes. Date of review: January 20, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: Julz
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: My first half marathon - I travelled a long way to do it and I'm already thinking of returning next year. A great day & race and some great company also. Date of review: October 1, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Thomas Voegel
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great Weather, beautiful day, my first Half Marathon In full: Nice scenery and some hills, so watch your speed - you could go too fast. Date of review: October 1, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: AJ Thompson
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: What, more hills? In full: Good race, well organised but quite hilly. Good crowds and great atmosphere. Date of review: October 1, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Longshanks
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Thought it was better organised than last year, or maybe it was just me that was organised better. Date of review: September 30, 2004
|

| |