Barretts Canterbury 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (155 votes). | The big picture (155 votes) | | Overall score | | 78% | | How many would do it again? | | 93% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 79% | | PB potential | | 61% | | Atmosphere | | 67% | | Organisation | | 75% | | Value | | 70% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 67% |
|
|
2012 race reviewed by: Mark Cadier
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A tough but not off putting run. Nice route through Bridge and surrounding country. In full: You'll need to be near the front if you want to avoid the bottle neck going out into the country - quite a narrow path with potholes. The hills are tough but not too bad. It's all downhill after the 3rd at 7 miles. My only gripe this time was 2 phone calls after the event from the organisers, first asking for my feedback on the race (nice!) but then trying to sell me insurance or a loan?! Date of review: February 2, 2013
|
2009 race reviewed by: Pippa Berger
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Definitely undulating! In full: This was my 1st 10 mile race and I found it a challenge. It was definitely undulating with a steep, long hill at 4 miles and another long but gradual hill at 6 miles. It seemed to be mainly hardcore runners out to get their PB. Lots of runners spitting too - gross! Really glad I was with my PT for moral support. The weather was fab (Jan 2010) and would do the race again but not on my own - not particularly friendly. Date of review: February 19, 2010
|
2009 race reviewed by: TwinOne
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: I really shouldn't have enjoyed this with the rain, puddles and ford, but I loved it! Date of review: February 13, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: julie quick 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Fab marshalls - lovely scenery -dreadful weather In full: Fab marshalls - they really encouraged all runners despite dreadful weather. Very well organised run - my first attempt at this distance. Shame about the t-shirt though - I would have preferred a medal instead. Date of review: February 3, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: David Jones 39
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good race despite the weather In full: We were unlucky with the weather-probably the worst morning for several months,especially the strong wind.
However,the race was as good as ever and the organisers had sorted a couple of "negatives" from previous years-parking near the race HQ and the no. of toilets.
Special thanks to the marshalls,especially those in the most exposed parts of the course.You did a great job and kept cheerful and supportive to us all,despite the cold and rain. Date of review: January 31, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Helen Fooks 3
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A great race in terrible conditions In full: The torrential rain and driving wind reduced all the ratings. The marshalls were fantastic - all soaking wet and freezing cold, but very supportive. Date of review: January 29, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Lesley Young 3
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: well organised race, weather bad but marshalls very helpful Date of review: January 29, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Bartster
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Enjoyable run. In full: I think it's more of a challenge to run in rough conditions and therefore more of an achievement.Not a day for the lightweight "fair-weather" runners. Date of review: January 26, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: HOOVILLE WANDERER
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Weather was bad, but the route was good In full: Had it been a fine day this race would have definitley had PB best potential for anyone. The scenery was great but the weather was such that i kept my head down, and plodded on, and feeling under the weather so to speak on the day, i was glad to get to the end. I was 10 minutes off my normal pace,but still did it in 1.28.Yes i would do it again to see if i could get a PB. Date of review: January 26, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: paul brasington
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: well organised, good course with a few tricky hills and puddles to dodge/ go through, good fun!! Date of review: January 26, 2009
|

| |