Langtoft 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (18 votes). | 1 to 10 of 18 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture (18 votes) | | Overall score | | 86% | | How many would do it again? | | 94% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 74% | | PB potential | | 87% | | Atmosphere | | 69% | | Organisation | | 82% | | Value | | 79% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 85% |
|
|
2011 race reviewed by: Mark Webster 5
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race
In full: Great 10k and a great fun run. Nice medal at the finish for both races. Already looking forward to next year!
Date of review: May 1, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: NRR
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised and definately worth doing
In full: Good course, very well organised, plenty of parking, not crowded at start or finish and a great set of marshalls. Same goes for the fun run which my son enjoyed thoroughly.
Next year could you make it less windy please as well?
Date of review: May 1, 2011
|
2010 race reviewed by: marc archer
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: |
In short: Organisers are doing their best and it's all for charity!
In full: In response to earlier comments - "alot of angry runners who had times scrubbed off for wearing an ipod" - this is not true. Runners are asked not to wear headphones for safety reasons but if they choose to ignore this request, the organisers cannot and DO NOT penalise them. Sorry if people don't like the medals. Sometimes "old stock" has to be used up but it has been noted!
Date of review: March 7, 2011
|
2010 race reviewed by: Paul Page 3
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great race. Naff medal!!
In full: The 10k race is well organised. Marshalling was good and the course was scenic and more importantly flat. Definatly PB potential. Water stations also frequent, which is good. Nice little HQ with decent cake/drinks stall. The only real downside is that the medal was pure rubbish. This one went straight into the drawer. They must be able to do something better. They weren't even all the same. Some had string on and some had bad quality tape. Despite this would definatly do again.
Date of review: May 2, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Jason Vernalls
| | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Very dissapointing medal, shame because very friendly staff and Organisers. Dissapointed.
In full: Did this race last year really enjoyed it. lovely glass block finishers prize. ( i know it was a 21st anniversary ) However, this year the 10k finshers medal was really cheap with a tacky string - The fun run medal was 100 times better !! alot of dissapointed people at end of race receiving that for a £9 fee. Also alot of angry runners who had times scrubbed off for wearing an ipod, surely the organisers can get a disclamer together for people to sign saying they not covered by insurance and run at own risk. i can only see this race getting smaller numbers unless they pick there game up. will seriously consider missing this one out next year which is a shame as i really recommended it last year.
Date of review: May 2, 2010
|
2009 race reviewed by: mmmm...marmite
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Brilliant race
In full: A super, very well organised village race. Excellent, super-fast route through picturesque countryside. Without the wind that we had this year, then this would be pure speed. Will definitely be back, as this is a PB course without a shadow of a doubt. Thanks to the organisers for a great race.
Date of review: May 4, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: northumberland
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: well organised race, good facilities, nice momento, fast course,
Date of review: May 3, 2009
|
2008 race reviewed by: Chris Smith
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Very good race, fast course but suitable for all speeds.
In full: Will be back next year. Very quick course, nice start & finish, plenty of parking, lots of staff, food. Everything a small race should be.
Date of review: May 4, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: Terry Welbourn
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Once again; a friendly, well-organised event.
Date of review: May 4, 2008
|
2008 race reviewed by: d morris 2
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well organised small run that will sort every type of runner. Recommended
Date of review: May 4, 2008
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
