Ranelagh Richmond Half-MarathonHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (51 votes). | 1 to 10 of 51 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
| The big picture (51 votes) | | Overall score | | 80% | | How many would do it again? | | 89% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 75% | | PB potential | | 83% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 73% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 67% |
|
|
2012 race reviewed by: JAMIE SMALLEY 2
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very well organised, along the Thames but as flat as you will find.
Date of review: May 7, 2013
|
2008 race reviewed by: Mohan Sekeram
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: great race, and really nice event to do post paris marathon. certainly has got be going . will certainly be entering next year. simple race- well organised and great views of richmond and the surrounding areas-. very quick race. lots of club run
Date of review: May 10, 2009
|
2006 race reviewed by: Paul Taylor 14
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Super Super Quick
Date of review: January 10, 2007
|
2006 race reviewed by: Vince Mullen
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Really good 1/2 see you next year
Date of review: May 19, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Louise Roberts 2
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: rewarding
Date of review: May 19, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: james r adams
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: A fast and scenic course that was well marshalled and had plenty of toilets at the start.
Date of review: May 19, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: CasF
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Worth getting up early for. Mostly great marshalling, appreciated their encouragement and plenty of water stations. Well organised race - wel done Ranelagh Harriers.
Date of review: May 18, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Russ D-B
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Fabulous scenic, FLAT course. Really friendly and great for first timers.
Date of review: May 18, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: PipG
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: A great value race with massive potential for PBs
Date of review: May 18, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Darren Bradley
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Flat, fast and early enough not to be too warm
In full: Well organised but I think the chip timing only worked at the end (so didn't take account of a half-minute-or-more delay for most of us to cross the start line).
Date of review: May 17, 2006
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
