Dereham 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (64 votes). | 1 to 10 of 64 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 |
| The big picture (64 votes) | | Overall score | | 86% | | How many would do it again? | | 98% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 73% | | PB potential | | 81% | | Atmosphere | | 70% | | Organisation | | 81% | | Value | | 82% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 76% |
|
|
2012 race reviewed by: Baz Morris
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Organisation like clockwork and great course In full: My second time here and enjoyed it again. I find it very well organised and a very friendly event. Hard to understand why only about 200 people ran this. Date of review: May 20, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: Motown Mark
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: My first 10m and was well impressed by the friendliness of the Marshalls who were are at the many road junctions along the way. Will definately be running this again next year. Date of review: May 18, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: jfk
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 20% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Great course, well organised, fantastic loos but very unfriendly marshals and poor support from spectators. In full: I was really looking forward to this race as it seemed a relatively flat course but quickly found that it was largely geared for club runners with support only going to team members and the wind against you from mile 6 to 9.5miles. Would I do it again, yes but only to beat my time. Date of review: May 14, 2012
|
2012 race reviewed by: the gray one
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: like clockwork an excellent race again In full: why do you runners world over look this race over every year poor show on your part Date of review: May 13, 2012
|
2011 race reviewed by: ANDREW STALLION
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: May 18, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Ed Proffitt
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Good time had by all! In full: Ran this race this year with a friend who had not done a 10 mile race before. Good size field with a fair spread of runners of all abilities means there is something for everyone. Well organised HQ and friendly marshalls make this a great race to enter! Date of review: May 17, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: the gray one
 | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: great race great cakes In full: got a pb well pleased best long race in this area by a mile its got the lot well done dereham runners Date of review: May 15, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Nik Chapman
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In full: Plenty of parking and toilet facilities at the start, well marshalled, good support throughout and lovely rolling course. Quite a strong cross wind but plenty of hedgerows for cover. 3 water stations was more than enough but only complaint is that I prefer a bottle of water as opposed to a cup. Good turn out from lots of local teams, will definately have another go. Date of review: May 15, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Doner Kebab
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: great first 10 miler In full: dont let the fast times of some of the runners put you off, its a good first timer 10M race with no major inclines, the roads arent that busy and if its your first 10 miler your guaranteed a PB :) Date of review: May 15, 2011
|
2010 race reviewed by: ChocolateChicken
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Enjoyable ten miler In full: Enjoyed this race a lot, and the bonus silver medal through the post was a lovely touch. Date of review: June 13, 2010
|

| |