Rockingham Motor Speedway 5Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (10 votes). | 1 to 10 of 10 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture (10 votes) | | Overall score | | 70% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 62% | | PB potential | | 82% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 78% | | Value | | 72% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 64% |
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: Running to stand still
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good organisation and excellent marshalling - Well worth doing - including the hill at the end! Date of review: May 25, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: andrew weatherby
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: cracking run thru the countryside finished off by a real fatburner hill Date of review: May 25, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: Stuart De Freyne
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Fast course, well organised, will be back next year! Date of review: May 27, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: sadman
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good course, lots of toilets, plenty of easy parking. made a really good change from other races. Date of review: May 26, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Charles Howard
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Very well organised & friendly event. A fast course, though quite exposed to the wind. Date of review: May 26, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Borders
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good for a runner searching for a PB. In full: Traffic free - wide track. A few to many turns for pure runners - the sort of course triathletes love!! Date of review: May 26, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Runner Martin
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised event - with the nice wide track In full: well organised nothing to fault it - enjoyable although tougher than expected Date of review: May 26, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Christopher Day
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Well organised. Friendly marshals. Good traffic management. Date of review: May 25, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: Geoff Arnell
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Banking good for speedsters! Date of review: May 22, 2005
|
2003 race reviewed by: Paul R
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|

| |