Wimbledon 10Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (17 votes). | 1 to 10 of 17 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture (17 votes) | | Overall score | | 59% | | How many would do it again? | | 71% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 53% | | PB potential | | 55% | | Atmosphere | | 51% | | Organisation | | 55% | | Value | | 64% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 54% |
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: Francois Le-maistre
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Friendly atmosphere Date of review: November 1, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Marco Di Franco
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Nice run past the tennis courts and Wimbledon Common Date of review: October 2, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: PFC For Sure
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Ist ever race - really enjoyed it despite the amazing down pours - made a timeI'm verry happy wih Date of review: October 1, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: i hate hills
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: excellent training race for gsr Date of review: October 1, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: jonathan weal 2
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Tree lined pavements passed Wimbledon Tennis club undulating not daunting. In full: Wimbledon Park and the athletics stadium hosts a good race.A wet day saw 150 plus runners show.The athletics track is circled in the beginning and the end, and the bounce from this surface eases the muscles in. Three laps of leafy suburb running with a 350 meter hill at Victoria Drive.Only beginners would find this course remotely difficult and Blackheath Harriers won in most impressive style with a 49minute ten mile race. Running with the best is always uplifting and being lapped by one of the countries top athletes spured me on.Credit to Wimbledon Hercules for attracting top runners.The hills short as they were then left long stretches of wide pavement running with small declines for long stretches.The park was a companion on the other side of the road and although there was some traffic it was not enough to worry. The downside was no distance markers .The upside was a course that gave you three laps of two mile declines after you had mastered the 350 meter hill.The athletic track was great to meet family and friends it overlooks the boating lake and there is a pleasent corner of SW19 that shows a London borough at its best.Although marshalls were not frequent they were in relaxed form and welcoming.The club snack bar serving a good cup of tea, and new members invited to join. The running season needs races like this one and respect to Wimbledon,keep up the good work and we look forward to your 50th. Jonathan Weal Date of review: October 1, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Gabs
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: No Mile markers at all and felt like it was over distance and unhelpful marshalls In full: With no mile markers, no point in having a race over the distance as impossible to check your pace, especially with hills. Marshalls unhelpful Date of review: October 1, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: Windmiler
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 20% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Organisation must improve. In full: The course was altered on saftey grounds due to road works. A prudent and sensible measure. The organisation failed to mention that this had shortened the course, further no revised maps were on display. The course ran at least 0.5 miles short. This turned a PB opportunity into a waste of time. The frustration is that the course finishes in Wimbledon Park and hence there was lots of potential for setting out the missing 0.5 miles. Overall impression was that they had your money and anythng else was an inconvenience. I look forward to beating ercules athletes at all future events! Date of review: October 2, 2005
|
2003 race reviewed by: Iain Brown 2
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 40% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: tough hill which has to be tackled 3 times In full: 3 Laps with a very steep hill (probably 400m long) which takes its toll on an otherwise flat and downhill course. Quite a high standard of runner. My wife, a beginner, did 2 laps. Date of review: September 26, 2005
|
2003 race reviewed by: Hazel Clark
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | No | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 20% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Boring 3 laps round the roads and no marshal at a crucial point In full: My friend and I were running this for the first time and didn't know the route we were told it would be obvious. It wasn't, and at one point we went wrong and had to go back on ourselves, no one seemed very interested when we told them at the end. Maybe this is a good one for locals, but we definatly wont be back. Also, it was frustrating to be that close to Wimbledon Common and not be running on it at all. Date of review: December 18, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: paul mainwaring
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: marshalling was fine- can't see where else they needed to put anyone although i had run the course beforehand. my niggle would be that no mile markers. otherwise great and a pb to boot Date of review: October 3, 2004
|

| |