Middlesex & Open 10K Road RaceHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (8 votes). | 1 to 8 of 8 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture (8 votes) | | Overall score | | 72% | | How many would do it again? | | 94% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 70% | | PB potential | | 88% | | Atmosphere | | 48% | | Organisation | | 65% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 45% |
|
|
2007 race reviewed by: Sarah Corley
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Good flat run in a lovely park - very fast
In full: the venue was great, and water provided once a lap which was spot on. Not the friendliest race but the nice venue balanced that out.
Date of review: September 18, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: keith lyon
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Hope to be back..cool race.
In full: Perfect. Flat, with a start and a finish, and an 'accurate' 10k in between. No silly goodie bag either. The race HQ was a true blast from someone's distant past. Expected to see Charles Dickens enter the room any moment.
Date of review: September 12, 2007
|
2005 race reviewed by: Boniface Earl Jones
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Quick race with good PB potential
In full: Very quick course where I've set 3 PBs in in the last 2 months! Good quality field with plenty of runners between 34 and 37 mins. Well marshalled and friendly atmosphere. Just a shame that another organisation were organising some jogs around the park at the same time which really got in the way of the faster runners.
Date of review: September 14, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Jane B
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: 3 laps of flat course within park, excellent PB potential.
Date of review: September 11, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: NoDarkHorse
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: I was travelling into area so it made a good race venue
Date of review: September 17, 2004
|
2004 race reviewed by: Jane B
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Flat with potential to be very fast on a less windy day.
Date of review: September 13, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: James Sherriff
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Flat and NO traffic.
Date of review: September 2, 2004
|
2003 race reviewed by: anthony miners
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
Date of review: August 24, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
