Pier to PierHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (11 votes). | 1 to 10 of 11 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture (11 votes) | | Overall score | | 96% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 82% | | PB potential | | 82% | | Atmosphere | | 71% | | Organisation | | 89% | | Value | | 84% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 78% |
|
|
2007 race reviewed by: She Runs For Cake
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great scenery route and prize! Date of review: May 27, 2008
|
2006 race reviewed by: MRV
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Another excellent run over a great point-to-point route....even managed to organise the tailwind again this year! Date of review: October 21, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: martin bates
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Couldnt fault the organisation In full: Some photos on www.weshamroadrunners.com - (Picture Gallery)mainly WRR runners, but a few others Date of review: October 13, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: blue nose
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: great race, results on ukroadraces Date of review: October 11, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Michael Graham 3
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: great race.....what about the results and photos!!!!! Date of review: October 11, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Spenner
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Really enjoyed it Date of review: October 10, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: DantheMan77
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great run if not the most inspiring scenery. Lucky we had the weather for it. Wouldn't fancy it in the wind & rain!! Date of review: October 8, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: city fan
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: lovely course - well organised - excellant t-shirt (best 4 a while) - could be a bugger in wind & rain Date of review: October 8, 2006
|
2005 race reviewed by: speedycath
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: good weather, good run, nice day. Date of review: October 10, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: MRV
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great route, well-organised, good T-shirt Date of review: October 9, 2005
|

| |