Esher Church School 10KmHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (23 votes). | 1 to 10 of 23 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
| The big picture (23 votes) | | Overall score | | 72% | | How many would do it again? | | 89% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 70% | | PB potential | | 63% | | Atmosphere | | 70% | | Organisation | | 66% | | Value | | 70% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 75% |
|
|
2006 race reviewed by: Bozo
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Enjoyed the run, made more fun following overnight rain. Good friendly marshalls. Finish needs to be kept clear of supporters wandering about!
Date of review: May 16, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Steve Miller 4
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: in woods - wet and muddy - not PB potential
Date of review: May 7, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Helsta
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Well-organised and friendly for a 1st-time runner!
Date of review: May 3, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: PKA
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great fun, well marshalled and friendly.
Date of review: May 2, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Mark Evans 13
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: First ever 10k for me! Enjoyed the mud.
In full: Nice route mainly a muddy trail which added to the fun.Friendly set up, good for first timers like myself.Enjoyed dodging the horses, squeezing through a gate on the 7k mark and then contending with not only a hill finish (not the biggest) but avioding most of the finishers heading back down the hill with their medals (they all cheered me on!.
Date of review: May 2, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: pipkins
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Friendly, scenic, special race
In full: Once again a great morning out. Mud and puddles added to the fun! Excellently marshalled, k markers were pretty accurate, great atmosphere. Hope to be back again 2007
Date of review: May 2, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Pete Rogers
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Friendly race with a nice course
In full: Friendly race with a nice well marshalled course with mixed tarmac and forest paths. A bit muddy in places but that just adds to the fun!
Couple of very minor niggles which can be easily rectified for next year and didn't really detract from a fun race,
The funnelling through the gateway immediately after the start, which caused the run to come to a standstill, could easily be avoided by making the start line / area the same width as the gate with a couple of bits of tape. I also agree with previous comments about too many folk wandering around in the finish area / last part of the course and the absence of any water at the finish.
Date of review: May 2, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: David Moss
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Nice event would benefit from a clock! Well marshalled and two water stops well spaced. Felt sorry for later finishers as they were running into a stream of people leaving. This is a good event and it has potential to be even better,
Date of review: May 1, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Shane Carlo
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Muddy, good fun, well organised and I did a PB for a cross country 10K. Great atmosphere with plenty of support.
Date of review: May 1, 2006
|
2006 race reviewed by: Nigel Moden
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: My first time. Definitely be back next year. Friendly with lots of mud thrown in for free.
Date of review: May 1, 2006
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
