Rotary Easter 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (34 votes). | 1 to 10 of 34 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 |
| The big picture (34 votes) | | Overall score | | 78% | | How many would do it again? | | 97% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 82% | | PB potential | | 69% | | Atmosphere | | 63% | | Organisation | | 68% | | Value | | 69% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 61% |
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: Rich Fletcher
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: my first race...loved it !!!
Date of review: April 14, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: MaguaTR
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Reasonable run particularly in good weather
Date of review: April 14, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Gary Worsley
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great atmosphere and scenery and downhill sprint a bonus at the end!
Date of review: April 12, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: James Fyvie
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: April 12, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: TiggerSC
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Enjoyed the race, needs the finish sorting for us slower ones!
In full: A nice race, most of the organization was great, good friendly marshals, water before the race, etc, but there were some areas that need improving on. A map of the course sent before the day, or at least having it available online would help. That way supporters would know how to arrange good viewing points. The end for us slower ones wasn't great, I had to run round a family armed with dog on longish lead! As for friendliness, lots of faster club runners, but all were supportive and friendly. Overall I enjoyed the event, and hope to return another year
Date of review: April 11, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: chalky...
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very nice.
Date of review: April 11, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Stuart Haynes 2
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Good race
In full: Easy parking nearby and loads of toilets. Couldn't understand a word the starter said. Great first 3 miles on the flat and the gentle climbs up the cliff road were OK - certainly no more testing than the Midhurst 10k. Fast last 1/2 mile, but the finish line was much further back than I thought. Knackered! Good race though, so I'll be back to beat my bad time!
Date of review: April 11, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Tortoiseorhare
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Swift and scenic
In full: Thanks for a smoothly organised, friendly race - lucky with the weather too. Runners at the back of the field had to negotiate their way through meandering crowds. Would it be worth tapes/barriers to encourage non-runners and those already finished to keep off the course?
Date of review: April 11, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Craig Dixon 2
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Fairly flat and fast course but shame about the organisation for the later runners who had to work way through spectators on the finish.
Date of review: April 11, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Brendan O'reilly
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: More water breaks otherwise a good race!
Date of review: April 11, 2009
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
