Ferndown Rotary Charity Fun RunHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (33 votes). | 1 to 10 of 33 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 |
| The big picture (33 votes) | | Overall score | | 67% | | How many would do it again? | | 79% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 84% | | PB potential | | 56% | | Atmosphere | | 62% | | Organisation | | 64% | | Value | | 68% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 70% |
|
|
2011 race reviewed by: RaveyD
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A tough but enjoyable race Date of review: March 13, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: Terry Stride
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In full: For 10k runners a drink would have been nice at the 5k loop. few steep inclines and well marshalled. They thought well with the cattle grid by filling it in with bark....well done who ever came up with that! where it was timed by officials it would be nice for a full results list or they could have called out time / place. A small event but well organised. tried keeping up with the quick runners only to find out they were only doing 5k !!! Silly Me Date of review: March 13, 2011
|
2011 race reviewed by: L B
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Had a great time In full: Well organised, very friendly, busy, great atmosphere. Hurrah to the marshalls - helped us get up those nasty inclines... Enjoyed the freebies, especially the sticky fluffy puffle Was it just me, or was there no water available? Date of review: March 13, 2011
|
2010 race reviewed by: pjb33
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: A very scenic course! In full: Great Sunny day and a nice, quite challenging course. Bit of confusion about the price of parking. Date of review: April 18, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Victoria Blackburn
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Great course once the crowd has filtered In full: I liked the course, it was challenging in parts when pushing yourself. Affiliated Runners pay more than un-affiliated runners!!! Guess everyone said they were un-affiliated. Car Parking fees were more than what was advertised. Felt very sorry for the last female finisher who had to guess where to run on the final 150m as the organisers had removed the barriers!! Date of review: March 22, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: leigh porter
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 20% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: little bit crazy on the start it was OK( Car Park Free Outside gate ) In full: Would probably do it again However they could have said to others that the parking as free in the Truck Park outside the Gate. Remember this Next year guys Date of review: March 22, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Jonathan Bowser
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Enjoyed the run, organisation not as good as previous years, and yes car park more expensive, but i paid £1.50 and stuck note and letter in windscreen saying why, and had no problems Date of review: March 22, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Richard Hayes 8
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Enjoyed it - cheers Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Scott Dunkley
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Pleasant course but don't like laps Date of review: March 21, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: L B
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 40% |
In full: Race started 5 minutes early - so no time to stretch Parking was more expensive than stated - I had no extra change Organisers had got my name completely wrong - and seemed fed up they had to re-issue me a number Other than that, a fairly pleasant run and good turnout, thanks to the Rotary for organising it. Date of review: March 21, 2010
|

| |