Tytherley 10K Here's how RW members rated this race (13 votes). | 1 to 10 of 13 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture (13 votes) | | Overall score | | 82% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 82% | | PB potential | | 62% | | Atmosphere | | 69% | | Organisation | | 77% | | Value | | 83% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 77% |
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: BooBoo LaBon
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Fab little 10k In full: Fell upon this race, and I am very pleased I did! Hill at 4k, but generally this race isn't too hard. Date of review: July 20, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: GRAHAM WICKHAM
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Very good race for such a small village In full: Very enjoyable race. One steepish hill and a climb to the finish but otherwise fine. Good surfaces underfoot. Would be great if they could achieve their limit of 100 runners. A few adverts placed around Salisbury would probably help. Date of review: July 19, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Dosher
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised and friendly race In full: Just completed the 2010 race. Well organsied and friendly event, lots of parking. 58 people in the field so not massive. 95% of race on the road running through narrow lanes, last 1km or so you join a busier road so a few cars coming towards you at speed. Hills not too bad but there is a small steep incline at the 4km mark which was earlier than expected, however, finnish line is on a hill, so the last 300 mtrs is upwards. Few raises on the way round too. Nice medal at the finnish line with a bottle of water as well. The only minor complain I would have is that the two water stations en route, the first was at 3km which was too early. Should be 5 and 8km's, but not a massive issue. Date of review: July 18, 2010
|
2009 race reviewed by: Lizzie Dunn
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Fairly steady route with a few gentle hills In full: I enjoyed today. A very pretty route starting and finishing in a beautiful village so lots to see and take your mind off the running! A fairly steady route, the hills were nice and gentle and has good PB potential. The only suggestion would be to have a water stop by the finish line just for the instant rehydration hit at the end. Date of review: July 12, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Cop-out
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Road race with some hillwork In full: This friendly low key race attracted both club runners and beginners. Set amongst village roads with little/no traffic it offered well placed km and route markers. Leave a little in the tank for the last 500metres. Date of review: July 12, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Roy's not as fast as he used to be
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Friendly and pleasant village race. In full: Smallish field of about 90, most entered on the day. Attracts a fair few club runners as well as beginners. Challenging hill at 4k and a short sharp one up to the finish. Beautiful countryside, quiet roads and a friendly feel all round. Many thanks. Date of review: July 12, 2009
|
2007 race reviewed by: Dave Bush
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Very friendly village race, with some challenging hills Date of review: September 25, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Mick F
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Another low key, great and enjoyable 10k In full: Beautiful countryside, friendly people, nice route....huge hill at 4k and uphill to the finish....coffee was great afterwards...I must re iterate...this part of Wiltshire is absolutely gorgeous. Onefor the organisers for next year: Better signage is required for the location of the race..overall - lots of fun!! Date of review: September 23, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: CDP
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: Nice local run, well organised, the hill at 9k to the finish got me. Date of review: September 23, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Beelzebub
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: I'd forgotten that hill at 4k... In full: Nice local race and well organised. Nasty hill at 4k though and you've got to dig slightly deep to find the energy to sprint uphill to the finish. Date of review: September 23, 2007
|

| |