G3 February 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (31 votes). | 1 to 10 of 31 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 |
| The big picture (31 votes) | | Overall score | | 88% | | How many would do it again? | | 94% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 97% | | PB potential | | 33% | | Atmosphere | | 76% | | Organisation | | 83% | | Value | | 81% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: Tony Gilling
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: This one is a bitch - those hills almost made me cry - will be back n Date of review: July 10, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: James Knowling
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: hilly and fun Date of review: February 16, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Debbie Fleming 2
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: A very generous 10km ! My Garmin measured 7.34 miles In full: Excellent race, course and atmosphere. I throughly enjoyed the terrain and the views. Date of review: February 16, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Mrs Billsy
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Hills that are vertical! not for the faint hearted but really good fun! In full: mud, cold, hills, total madness! was a really interesting way to start the day, nothing could prepare you for how steep the hills were, walking was allowed in many places (and the only option in one) but all in great spirits, very well organised, great marshalls and a drink and banana - times and photos available in record time - recommend it to those that want a challenge! Date of review: February 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Kate Davies Pugh
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A good race, tough on the legs (hilly and uneven) Date of review: February 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: emdee
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: evil, evil, evil. brilliant :) In full: ohmygod I forgot how nasty Martha's Back Passage is. Cracking morning though :) Date of review: February 15, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Donnie Murdo
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Not one for the weak hearted or sparrow-legged In full: A morale-sapping race especially the 1 in 9 ascent of St Martha's Hill. Efficiently run with plenty of marshalls on route and food and drink at the end. Will do again next year but only after leg work at the gym. Date of review: February 14, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Carla Terry
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 40% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: If you like hills, and you would prefer to do this one almost on your hands and knees at one point... the do it.. Def not one for complete beginners to running... those hills are absolutely evil/somehow enjoyable?? Date of review: February 14, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: acebrian
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Lack of markers on a very tough route. Hard race and very early too. Date of review: February 14, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Murky
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Beautiful area to run in In full: Well organised with nice marshalls, and a very good if painful course. But, my Garmin insisted it was about 6.8 miles which doesn't add up to 10k. Still fun though! Date of review: February 14, 2009
|

| |