Farndon 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (42 votes). | 1 to 10 of 42 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 4 5 |
| The big picture (42 votes) | | Overall score | | 72% | | How many would do it again? | | 98% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 73% | | PB potential | | 72% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 69% | | Value | | 72% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 67% |
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: panad
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: friendly, well supported rural race, looking forward to doing again :D
In full: my first time at this event, but thoroughly enjoyed it. a good no of supporters given the small, rural nature of the race. markers every mile, enough undulations to keep you interested and even perfect weather! looking forward to returning next year :D
Date of review: March 13, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: JANE DUNNE
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: March 8, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Helen W
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 100% |
In short: friendly undulating country fun
In full: Thoroughly enjoyed this 10k. Great friendly atmosphere, well organised, nice medal. Quite a few undulations but broke a long standing PB so very happy.
Date of review: March 8, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Hackos
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Lovely day and a very pleasant race
In full: My first event of the year and has got me in the mood for more. Enjoyed it - great weather and seemingly well organised. Only saw 3 markers at 3, 5 and 6 miles. Would have been good to have had a few more.
There were some moderate hills to contend with but nothing too bad. Rural and pretty much traffic free.
Date of review: March 8, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: ian&eve
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: very pleasent event well worth the drive
In full: Pretty rural roads. Well organised. Top notch weather. What more could you want. Thanks to Wrexham Road Runners.
Date of review: March 7, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Team Win
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
Date of review: March 7, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Mr Puffy
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Big improvement on the old 3 miles out and turn round a cone route
In full: glorious weather, a lovely route, easy parking and good facilities. Liked the walk to and from the start.
Date of review: March 7, 2010
|
2009 race reviewed by:
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice rural course. Plenty of marshalls. Medal.
In full: I enjoyed this one. The weather was fab for March.
A few little hills, but nothing horrible!
Date of review: March 4, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Beedge144
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Nice race, pretty flat with no killer hills ;-) Water stop at 5 km was a shambles. Gorgeous weather made the day. y
In full: First race I've ever entered, part of training up for Chester Half Marathon in May.
Will definitely be running next year.
Was very disappointed by water stop - nothing lined up, and could only grab an inch of water in a cup, unless I'd stopped. Nowhere to toss cups though, so held on to it until end of race. Why did everyone have to chuck them ? Each marshall on course should have had a bin bag!
Markers only every mile - not every km as stated in listing.
Date of review: March 2, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Katy Main
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: Lovely scenic course
In full: Really nice day for it, course is beautiful countryside, pleasant day all round
Date of review: March 2, 2009
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
