Securicor Sutton Runners 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (88 votes). | 1 to 10 of 24 ratings | Page: 1 2 3 |
| The big picture 2007 (24 votes) | | Overall score | | 76% | | How many would do it again? | | 92% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 65% | | PB potential | | 78% | | Atmosphere | | 63% | | Organisation | | 82% | | Value | | 82% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 72% |
|
|
2007 race reviewed by: ninjaman
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Brilliantly organised & potentially quick In full: Only one v slight incline - which gets bigger on the 3rd lap. Overall enjoyable and great photo service on the website Date of review: May 9, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: epsom andy
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well organised 10k with a surprising good momento! In full: Overall a enjoyable, well organised 10k - the course is flat but not particularly memorable with 3 laps (aggh..laps!!) and a lot of time spent on roads. However, there was a great atmosphere and a suprisingly good quality momento at the end! Date of review: May 8, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Andrew Gwyther
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 40% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Flat course, but less on crowded pavements would be great Date of review: May 8, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: funkin (5.)
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great marshalling. Super slick organisation. A great little race. In full: Great organisation. Supportive marshalls throughout. The course was so-so. I liked the bits in the park (even if it was windy), but the first part of the road section wasn't so great. Lots of kerbs, corners and cars (especially on the first lap when I had to go onto the road at times to get a clear path). Results online the same day. Lovely momento. Date of review: May 7, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: SteveX
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent organisation, car parking , changing, toilerts etc. Enjoyed this more this than last for soem reason. Well marshalled. A PB oppportunity too and a really nice glass mememto at the finish. Very good value all round. Date of review: May 7, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: DIY Diva
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: In a word - GREAT Date of review: May 7, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Kirsty B
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: 3 laps - bad, organisation - good In full: I could not seem to get excited about this race before, during or after which was reflected by my not-great result. I really don't like laps, although I did enjoy the added challenge of not getting lapped (avoided it by about 10 seconds!). The organisation was excellent all round, well done Sutton Runners. Friendly, helpful efficient marshalls, well organised start and finished, clean toilets with NO queue 10 minutes before the start, and a lovely unusual glass trophy thing. I also enjoyed collecting 6 prizes afterwards - none of which were for me I hasten to add, but for club members who had already left. Well done Stragglers for winning nearly everything :o) Date of review: May 7, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Keith Scudamore
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Nice work out In full: Like to to this one as I ran my first X-country race in B. Park in 1953.Pity about the girl tripping over the speed hump just as I was scared of doing, otherwise it was a pleasant morning run. Date of review: May 7, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: Mrs Funkin
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Who'd have thought it could be so much fun to be lapped?! In full: The organisation of this race was great, no toilet queue either, great marshalls, lovely memento. Downsides: the crush over the bridge and the uppy downy kerby bits (I know that there isn't much that can be done about that though!). I rather liked being lapped, mainly because I knew lots of the people doing the lapping (but I wish the people at the back with me had thought about being lapped and kept left a bit more). Hopefully I will be lapped by less people next year. Date of review: May 7, 2007
|
2007 race reviewed by: racer dan
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: if you take away the fact that you have to do 3 laps. this isn't a bad way to spend a Sunday morning in May. Date of review: May 7, 2007
|

| |