Warminster Plain Crazy 12Here's how RW members rated this race in the past (20 votes). | 1 to 10 of 20 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture (20 votes) | | Overall score | | 79% | | How many would do it again? | | 95% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 82% | | PB potential | | 51% | | Atmosphere | | 72% | | Organisation | | 63% | | Value | | 76% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 63% |
|
|
2009 race reviewed by: melvin vayle
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 100% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: cold windy and lots of road In full: too much road - would be worth making longer to avoid the very hard concrete tank track in the last third(not fun in trail shoes). even if it went up to 16 miles it would be worth it to run off road outside of the tank range (I believe there is a perimeter path). no major organisational problems a bit of fine tuning will sort it ! Date of review: January 7, 2010
|
2009 race reviewed by: Jennifer Davis
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 20% |
In short: Wow, a windy, tricky race In full: This was described as arduous and in parts it really was. The wind came whipping over the plain something rotton in parts-but it was a good run! Date of review: January 2, 2010
|
2009 race reviewed by: Mark Rice
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
Date of review: December 29, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Carol Bradwell
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Not quite what I expected! In full: A great chance to enter forbidden territory! (if you had the strength left to raise your head above the biting wind.)I thought it was a brilliant first effort. Well done to you all, but who kept burning the bacon butties? Date of review: December 29, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Jo Pitcairn
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: wild, hilly, easy on the feet In full: Very enjoyable - a bit like being on the moors with barren open land stretching to the horizon. The mostly made-up tracks were easy to run on and I was surprised by the number of cars passing by. Could the start be nearer to the registration hall? Date of review: December 29, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Jonathan Cole
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 100% |
In short: plain crazy In full: Wild race ,it did what it said on the tin.Tough race should make the adjustment to half marathon and i reckon this would be a popular event.Just what you need to fill the Christmas gap. Date of review: December 29, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Majors
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Killer wind & hill for last couple of miles In full: Credit to the organisers for asking for constructive feedback. Problem with lack of cups at water station. Should have been advertised as a road shoe race. Lack of directions to HQ. Basic errors yes but sinple to correct for next time around. A good tough workout, especially towards the end. With a slight detour or extension of start/finish this would be a challenging half marathon Date of review: December 29, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: jenny mills
 | | Overall score | | 40% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: |
In short: Boring but mentally challenging In full: You worked hard to make the race successful with good organisation. Wrong shoes, nearly lost the will to live in the wind! Date of review: December 28, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: Emi
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Maybe | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 40% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Certainly challenging but the scenery was great Date of review: December 28, 2009
|
2009 race reviewed by: hilbunny
 | | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: A reality check after christmas layoff Date of review: December 28, 2009
|

| |