Snow+Rock G3 March 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (11 votes). | 1 to 10 of 11 ratings | Page: 1 2 |
| The big picture (11 votes) | | Overall score | | 94% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 88% | | PB potential | | 31% | | Atmosphere | | 78% | | Organisation | | 89% | | Value | | 78% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 67% |
|
|
2010 race reviewed by: Keri Ashworth-Beaumont
 | | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 40% |
In short: effin murder - 4 days to recover but I think I loved it!
Date of review: March 9, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Dan Wallace
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Loved the climbs
In full: Everytime I thought I was heading for a good time, I got caught out by an impending Hill grr no fair. All the runners were really friendlly and will be looking to do the series again next year.
Date of review: March 8, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Robert Haynes 2
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Tough but fun
Date of review: March 8, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Roger Barr
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 100% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Excellent event. 2nd time I've done it and can't fault it. Even recovery drinks at the end!
Date of review: March 7, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Mrs Billsy
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: hills hills and more hills, but great fun!
Date of review: March 6, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: The Other Man
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Tough as! At least this month's version ends downhill, making a good end to a tough series.
In full: As you set off on these races you're often flying down a hill, only to be hit by the thought "every down has an up". And boy, are there some ups! A real test of whether you can get legs moving again once they're full of lactic acid from plodding/walking up a hill, great atmosphere and a really good atmosphere - possibly the fact that the field seems to be full of triathletes and first timers makes for a difference from most road race/club cross countries, and I'm enjoying the difference.
Date of review: March 6, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: simon young
| | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: You can't beat running up (walking up) St Martha's back passage
Date of review: March 6, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Sarah Rollins
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: A must do race. Good prizes, good post race gizzits and a great set of routes.
Date of review: March 6, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Dustboy
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 100% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Well, we did it in 35lb pack and boots and weren't last! But ouch.
In full: Probably the hardest I have ever pushed a race, felt ill during, ill after and hooky now but what an experience. And good to see the "old" March course is back. Just pain and hills. See you all next year!
Date of review: March 6, 2010
|
2010 race reviewed by: Tim A
| | Overall score | | 100% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 20% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 100% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Great organisation, very challenging, but good fun.
In full: This is a great series of races; near perfect organisation and friendly marshalls. Race 3 seemed to hurt even more than race 2. These are challenging races but really good fun. Many thanks.
Date of review: March 6, 2010
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
