Midweek Series 10KHere's how RW members rated this race in the past (6 votes). | 1 to 6 of 6 ratings | Page: 1 |
| The big picture (6 votes) | | Overall score | | 73% | | How many would do it again? | | 100% | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 77% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 73% | | Organisation | | 73% | | Value | | 83% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 67% |
|
|
2005 race reviewed by: athletic freek!!!!!!
 | | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 60% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Good organisation thought it would be flat-but the hills were a killer-so no PB!
Date of review: April 14, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Jude Durrant
| | Overall score | | 60% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 40% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Beautiful area, excellent organisation. Hills enough to wake you up and make you grit your teeth
Date of review: April 13, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Freemers
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 80% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 60% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 80% |
In short: Really enjoyed this, despite the hill that seemed endless (twice!)
In full: My only slight complaint was the rather crowded HQ, as there was no main hall to congregate in, and everyone seemed to mill around outside. Not sure how easy that would have been if it had rained. But I thought the course was good - the hill that went on for a km was a challenge, especially the second time round. But what goes up must come down, and I enjoyed stretching it out on the downhill bits. And I got a PB by more than 2 minutes, so must have been OK!
Date of review: April 11, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: Aaron Blows
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: very good but the start was rubbish
Date of review: April 10, 2005
|
2005 race reviewed by: ermintrude75
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 80% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 80% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 100% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Would do it again... and this time be prepared for the hill!
In full: A nice race, with friendly organisers, marshals and crowds, and really quite pretty in places. Perhaps a tad cruel that the course with its loops and laps made you run past the "200m to finish" sign three times in all! The hill was a bit of a killer but then the race did start at the Norfolk Ski Club (stop laughing at the back) so there was a clue. Here's hoping this is the first of many for the Trowse race.
Date of review: April 10, 2005
|
2004 race reviewed by: ermintrude75
| | Overall score | | 80% | | Would you do it again? | | Yes | | | | Details: | | Scenery | | 60% | | PB potential | | 60% | | Atmosphere | | 60% | | Organisation | | 80% | | Value | | 80% | | Beginner-friendliness | | 60% |
In short: Top marks for coping with an enforced route-change on the day (nb this means the ratings of the route may not apply in the future!)
Date of review: September 1, 2004
|
| |
denotes Subscriber-only content | 
