Nike+ sport band - your opinions

18 messages
05/09/2008 at 18:58

Anyone got or used one of the Nike+ sport bands which calculates you mileage etc?

 What do you think of it?

Would like some general opinions before I shell out £40

05/09/2008 at 21:11

Hi Kate,

Loved it at first. Fantastic motivational tool; couldn't wait to upload my stats each time. However, I got a little bit despondent after realising that it is not very accurate. You can calibrate it but as my running changed the more inaccurate it became.

On my first 10k race it registered 11.9 km! It may be that I am doing something wrong.

I now prefer my nike triax watch / heart rate monitor and use a mapping tool for distance and record my runs / stats on FETCH.

In summary it is good but only if you don't mind the fact that it almost certainly won't be accurate.

05/09/2008 at 21:39

I personally love the thing but being fair it does need regular calibrations.

Regular calibration are needed just to make sure that you haven't changed your running style or suffered an injury that might effect your gait, stride, etc

 With calibration the sportband delivers pretty good accuracy for me (3.7 mile run with be within 0.1 mile accuracy). But hey it also does the time as well so it also serves itself well as a stopwatch.

It doesn't even need nike+ trainers if you use a shoe pouch, the website is pretty good and can be great fun to set up stupid challenges/goals/challenges.

Surely £40 well spent?

06/09/2008 at 08:22
does it come with the shoe pouch or is that extra?
06/09/2008 at 09:18

Extra - got mine from ebay. I liked my nike+ at first but like other person I realised it was inaccurate and I had to keep recalibrating it every week or so as my running changed. Gave up and got a garmin instead.

06/09/2008 at 18:44

Spinkletoes,

Is it a GPS garmin or a footpod job? If its a footpod is it more accurate?

06/09/2008 at 18:47

GPS and it's great!! Model 205 It's not got a HRM thing on it though (I figure if I'm still running then my heart must definitely be beating!) Cost me £100 from amazon - which was about as much as I fancied paying. I think, but not sure and don't quote me on it, but the GPS is more accurate than a foot pod.

hth

08/09/2008 at 09:25

I've got one, only got it just recently and I have to say I am loving it... I have an MP3 that fairly accurately tracks my distance but I wanted the Nike+ to track my pace which it does, It probably isnt 100% accurate but as a reference tool then I think for £40 its brill.  I looked at a Garmin but I couldnt justify spending that much money when money is tight.  I got my shoe pouch off amazon for £6 + P&P as I dont have Nike+ trainers.

PS Apparently my pace is all over the place, which I didnt realise until I started using the band...

08/09/2008 at 12:57

You may well need to calibrate it, but once done it should be fairly accurate.

Mine keeps pace to within 0.01 of a mile to my OH's Garmin.

I don't have Nike shoes, and use a bit of plastic bag and duct tape to tape the foot bit to my laces.

I've tried the Garmin 205 and it is more interesting, as it records your pace per mile, etc., but I found the wrist unit was a complete irritation on my skinny wrists.

23/02/2009 at 00:39

It's an old thread, but the Nike+ Sportsband has been withdrawn from sale due to a malfunction problem.

I had one and just over 260 miles the LCD screen starting to fade, within 3 days it had fully gone and made the item totally useless.

They are currently working on a new version, which they hope to introduce later this year.

23/02/2009 at 08:21
I had (or have) the Nike+ ipod (which I think is similar). It's crap. Actually pretty accurate if calibrated, but it seems to stop recording if you stop (eg to stretch or whatever). Garmin 305 can be got for ~£100 now I think - much better.
29/03/2009 at 17:55

hi all - i have a nike+ ipod and have just run my first 10k race today (yay for me !) the timing was ok - but the distance is miles off.  (it recorded me as having run 11.3km).  I am forever calibrating it - but it just seems to get more innaccurate !  I am considering a garmin type thing - but not sure about the cost of circa £100.

 any suggestions ?

29/03/2009 at 17:59
I just use MapMyRun.com and a stop watch
29/03/2009 at 18:05
 hi all i've got one and agree with the other's it's not very accurate, i use it as a guide while i'm running but like other's use fetch mapping to record my training. i do like the voice of athlete's that congratulate on a record distance one being lance armstrong
29/03/2009 at 18:20
Lostkat wrote (see)
I just use MapMyRun.com and a stop watch

i also use this sophisticated piece of kit Lostcat - and its a lot more accurate than the blimmin Nike+ !!!

25/10/2009 at 07:47
I have experienced issues with the Nike+ unit in terms of accuracy. To log the required 10k for the Nike+ run yesterday, I needed to run just over 11k and that's with the unit callibrated. I am also not keen on taking my iPhone on longer runs such as 1/2s and marathons so I do use a Garmin Forerunner 305 and, of all my running purchases, this stands head and shoulders above the rest... If I had to start all over again, this would be first on my list. It is most definitely worth the investment (Can also be used hillwalking etc to track your routes later on Google Earth). I do like the Nike+ community/web site however, and, as such, persevere with my Nike+ unit on shorter runs.
29/07/2010 at 12:21
old thread but I thought I'd just second what Scottish Mike said: I've had my Nike+Sportsband for two years, and all of a sudden the LCD screen just went blank in a couple of days. and now it's useless.

had a lot of fun with it for these years though, but would not buy again. I am now looking at buying a Garmin Forerunner 305 instead.
29/07/2010 at 18:38
why all this technology? It complicates running. I don't time my runs, but I check the time before I leave the house and when I return. I have a rough idea how far I have run based on my usual pace. I know I can run 1.5 miles in under 9 mins, I know I can run 5k(20mins) 10k(40mins) so if I am back home and 70 mins have gone by -10 mins warm up, I have ran 8-9 miles, but we we always sprint with everything left so it could be 10, yes I could be a mile or two out, does it matter? Well as i'm not in the 2012 olympics, no. Running is fun, when you make it into a job like activity checking progress and if your reaching targets then what are you trying to achieve? Maybe I just don't get it.

We'd love you to add a comment! Please login or take half a minute to register as a free member
18 messages
Forum Jump  

RW competitions

RW Forums