God moves in mysterious ways!
I like on University Challenge when you have Jesus College on, so the announcer goes:
Its quite funny, next time there is a Jesus college on, have a listen. Tis good for a laugh.
Nothing to do with the photo of the Bishop's Mitre then
Everyone knows God is just a made up fairy tale anyway.
The reason that the thread was deleted was probably because of that disgusting image of a penis that someone uploaded on to it.
Some people always have to post something that spoils it for everyone else.
lol ....... who did that then? (no it wasnt me!)
It was LardArse.
Theyve disabled the insertion of HTML now ...... boo!!!!!
Well if you boys can't play nicely then they have no choice but to take your toys away
but I was about to do a funny thing with some html which I cant do now
I agree that it was probably to do with the offensive picture, but could they not have deleted the post rather than the whole thread?
I'm wondering though - is a photo of a penis really an offensive thing if it isn't doing anything to anybody?
If nudity per se isn't necessarily sexual then why should an unclothed wang be?
It's not appropriate though. People don't come on here expecting to see that.
Rickster: I agree that the post was inappropriate.
Screamapillar: Your point, I think, is about who is offended and why? It is not a disimillar argument to the recent discussions about swearing on the forum. Where is the boundary drawn on such issues?
the usual argument put up by RW Towers for cazzing a thread or deleting a post is that this is an open forum that can be read by anyone of any age of any persuasion - note I say read as you have to be a member to post.
that means kids, scammers, trolls, pervs, right wingers, religious loonies i.e. absolutley anyone with internet access can read the forums so RW usually play safe by deleting something that might cause offence to someone or their parent/friend/guardian/god/whatever....
which is usually good enough to see the back of any decent thread that doesn't offend most on here...
if several people quoted the picture so it appeared more than once they might have thought it was easier to delete the whole thread that go and remove several posts and then the thread might not make sense........
I would expect them to inform the person who posted the photo and the person who started the thread of their reasons...
but i might be wrong as i haven't had a thread cazzed,,,,,,,,,,,
They could have deleted just that post, or the image, rather than the whole thread, though?
but wilkie.others posted the piccie on there under the quote function..........which would have remained
"you have to be a member"
I see what you did there, fb ...
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |