right or wrong?
Its from a time gone by..
Each to his own where kids are invlved you do what you think is right anyway. For what it's worth it's only a symbol of racism if you think that way
Quite apart from what it represents, they're also quite ugly things...
It represents a stuffed toy and most stuffed toys are ugly
I would say over-sensitive but then as Barkles says, these were common when he and I were lads - Robertson's jam used the golliwog as it's brand image back in the 50's and 60's (probably before as well) and the dolls were part of that branding.
tbh - I'm surprised they even found a golliwog doll to buy as I wouldn't have though they were made in these more "enlightend" days. perhaps it's a collector's item?? if so, take it - it might be worth something in the future...
google "Black and White Minstrel Show" if you'e not aware of it - that's what we had to watch on TV in the 50's and 60's. unfuckingbelievable.....
I think you know that's rather a naive view EKGO.
FB, they were on sale in Monmouth recently!!
This has always baffled me slightly. It's a doll. It's black. What's the problem?
you have fairly obviously done the right thing.
a strange choice of gift though. i can't believe that the in-laws are not aware of the racial connotations of the golliwog doll, so why choose that out of a million possible options for a present?
are they making a barely-veiled political statement? rage against political correctness?
regardless of the rights and wrongs of golliwog dolls, its pretty appalling to use a 6-month old boy to illustrate some sort of half-baked sociological point.
They first appeared in children's books in 1895, I understand, and were based on black and white minstrel characters. Now, I understand social mores were different at the time, but there is quite clearly a racist element behind the depiction of black people.
More disturbingly, I will probably have nightmares tonight because I've managed to find one that looks like Ken Dodd.
sarah - The Golliwog represents a symbol of racism. they are a ridiculous caricature (admittedly so are other dolls) with frizzy hair, white staring eyes and paws instead of hands. to my knowledge it's based on a horrible 19th century storybook character by Florence Upton who was roughly treated and ridiculed by his playmates.
aside from any historical context however, it is not about what i think and it is not about what you think.
i'd say a significant number of black people find golliwog dolls offensive, and therefore common politeness should stop us from reproducing their icon where possible, and certainly not normalizing them as presents for children who cannot know better.
runningowl - if it isn't a political statement, then what? why give that? they cannot be unaware of the offense it might cause. are they just stupid?
I find Barbie dolls offensive, and I'm fairly certain I could find plenty of people who agree with me. I'm not calling for them to be banned though.
And I'd be amazed if the doll was given to make a political statement, that just seems utterly absurd. It's a doll. It happens to be black. I wouldn't find it offensive, and I'm not going to presuppose offence on someone else's behalf. As you say, lots of dolls are caricatures. Surely it's a greater example of racism to say you can't have a black doll?
Should all red heads be protesting against this sort of thing? Stereotypically frizzy hair, freckles, etc. It shouldn't be normalized!
Barkles wrote (see)
FB, they were on sale in Monmouth recently!!
that's Monmouth for you mate....
but perhaps let's not get too over-sensitive here - these dolls are probably made by some nigg....coloured person....
no, because nobody is saying you can't have a black doll. are all black dolls gollliwogs? no.
this is a Golliwog doll, which has strong cultural and hstorical associations with the subjugation of black people, and that is what we are discussing.
As I said, regardless of the rights and wrongs, the doll does cause offense to people, something the in-laws could not possibly have been unaware of. Imagine if the wee boy took the doll into nursery. right or wrong, it would cause offense, which places a small child in a very awkward position which they could not have been aware of.
whether it's politically correct nonsense or not, it isnt fair on the child. if the parent wants to parade a golliwog doll around that is their business as a free adult, but the child cannot exercise that choice.
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Limited. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |