Owl not read it cover to cover but read a lot of it as might be an impact on what I do on stuff because I sometimes moon light at public events and also deal with the police on a range of issue's. Afraid a lot of it know already just because much of it was already in the public domain but wasn't part of the inquest before. But having it all in one document has turned it from just things said to a proper document that has legal repercussions.
The newspaper key parts but don't really give a sense of the scale of the way the disaster was handled. The talk that this has only come about because of the 30 year rule being waived on the face of it is a concern but some of the evidence may not have been considered without it being corroborated by the government minutes and related information?
Afraid while there is clear to my mind evidence of wrong doing's after the events and also clear evidence of incompetence and also a failure I'm not sure if there is just one person or group to solely blame. The authorities at the time didn't protect the people going to the game as they should have done and ingored repeated warnings of what was inefitable. They have tried to make out this was caused by other issue's through which goes to the heart of problem the families have faced for the last 23 years.
