An autumn maths puzzzler
So, this afternoon I filled 3x 60x60x60cm bags full of leaves from my front garden,
The garden is about 8x8m square with a mature magnolia in the middle and there is a mature sycamore outside the front gate.
The magnolia has about 20% of its leaves remaining and the sycamore about 10%
How many leaves do you reckon are in the bags?
(FYI - I haven't got a clue I just wondered if anyone fancied a guess )
There will be more shoots for eating.
About 50% less than if you had filled 6 similar bags?
All of them ?
Definitely not all of them.
I'd simply calculate the number.
Take 100 leaves.
Weigh them. Establish the average weight.
Weigh the whole lot.
There you go.
Wet or dry?
And how many of each type should be included in the sample base ?
Ah, good point...
One. I read it and now I leaves.
Ok, just take and weigh a random handful of leaves and count those etc
You'd need to be careful about where the sample comes from so it doesn't get overly influenced, for instance taking the sample from the ground around the magnolia on the opposite side of the sycamore would likely give a higher ratio of magnolia to sycamore.
whilst we have been given values of the leaves remaining on the branches, we don't know the value remaining the last time they were cleared, this could affect the ratio of any sample. We also don't know the direction of the prevailing wind. Is it blowing the sycamore leaves into the garden, or the magnolia out?
Is the answer 42?
There were definitely lots
Chimney: happy to help. This was the first time they were swept up this autumn so I was dealing with 100% of leaf fall so far. The prevailing wind has been from the SW at varying strengths from gale force to very calm. Fences on either side and a front wall mean that once they are in the leaves can't get out except in the event of upward force such as a tornado.
Other that that do you think it's worth asking Brian Cox?
Hold on Brian Cox for now. RicF may need to reassess this new information first
More than 10.
This seemed promising initially but I lost interest when it got to the bit about overlap.
Thank-you Screamy, that is very helpful. Do I take it a SW wind blows directly into your garden, therefore the leaves from the Sycamore will be mostly blown, and remain, in your garden? Is there evidence of Sycomore leaves on your roof? And any evidence of being blown over your roof? This will of course complicate matters and using LAI values will as a consequence be an inaccurate guess. Just because a leaf was on the tree, doesn't mean it ended up in one of the bags. There is also the possibility of leaves other than the sycamore and magnolia ending up in your garden.
However, there is a possible solution for you. If your estimation of the amount of leaves left on each is correct, you could count the leaves you have left to extrapolate an answer for how many leaves 100% is. There would still be the matter of the leaves that became dis-attached from the tree but aren't in your garden, but these may have been compensated for by leaves from other trees as noted above, also those that have been consumed by animals, bacteria etc would need to be given a value. there would be an amount that have been partially consumed, would you be counting each partially consumed leaf as a leaf or combining them to count as a whole leaf to reach the number of leaves in your bags?
Still too many variables...... ;-)
Am I right?
Do I get a prize?
make it a Forerunner 620 with new HRM, or a place on the Asics 26.2 team
The sycamore is to the north of the front wall, so the stronger the wind, the less likely the leaves are to end up in the garden. It is also much taller than the magnolia so there is definitely a higher ratio of magnolia to sycamore leaves.
The partially consumed leaf scenario is interesting at what stage does a leaf officially become compost?
978,64 certainly constitutes "a lot" so you may well be correct within a certain margin of error.
Would you accept a small sapling as a prize?
The easiest thing to do is to get a life and then you won't ponder such mindless questions.
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2014 |