and the way you engage with them?
I take online people at face value. If they are racist, misogynistic, or in any other way objectionable, I avoid them. They may really feel that way or they may just be trolls - I don't want to interact with them either way.
I don't feel any sense of responsibility for them.
it's best not to think about it.
the truth is out there merry xmas runners world forumites theres more good people out there than wierdos ....
kittenkat wrote (see)
the dude abides wrote (see) it's best not to think about it. And play on my new Kindle... ? Because I have a NEW kindle.
the dude abides wrote (see)
it's best not to think about it.
And play on my new Kindle... ?
Because I have a NEW kindle.
Watch you don't prick your finger in your new Kindle! you'll sleep for a hundred years!
Like Wilkie I take people at face value.
I'm not a "validator" - if I think people need to be told something straight I'm likely to tell them and I don't really care whether they like that or not. I sometimes post on another forum where it can be a bit "there, there" and "poor you" and I'm the one that will say - "Well, no, actually you can do something about this!" That's probably what I'd be telling this American guy.
That wouldn't make me responsible though. Whether he seeks help is ultimately up to him.
I think the hoax call is something different. The nurse didn't ask to get inolved in any of that after all. And no-one could have predicted her reaction.
Interesting one KK, and hard to know unless you meet face to face. Why don't you save up and fly over to meet him? You could always enjoy your Kindle on the flight.
I don't troll or flame people even if my private opinion of them/their forum persona is very low and I find their opinions repellent. I've got enough stress in my life without inviting more stress by telling some random loser exactly what I think of them.
In terms of "vulnerable" people, well, I suppose I wouldn't add fuel to the fire but similarly I wouldn't feel responsible for them. The motives of someone posting in a chatty forum for advice on a sensitive issue are questionable anyway, do they actually want advice or do they just want to boast?
I treat online people as I treat anyone else. I avoid/ignore those that I feel uncomfortable about. I will offer an opinion but not 'tell' people that they are wrong even if I do know what I am talking about sometimes! One or two even pm their appreciation and come across better than on the forum.
However if I felt seriously concerned about someone's postings' ( none so far) I would probably try and report it. I have my favourite forumites and nobody on ignore.
Hmm. I treat people online as I do in the real world. I wouldn't attack anyone unless provoked and would help where I can...
I don't need to assume an aggressive personality in a virtual world in order to feel good about myself.
I avoid the trolls and the nasties, no point in giving them an opening, they just want to stir things up.
Well i met my partner online. We have been together 10 years, and have an 8yr old son. There is extremes to both sides like people in general.
In real life this guy is probably just a just a nobody, not very popular, got anger issues, not liked very much, so attacks others to get a reaction. My philosophy is not give a naughty child attention.
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2014 |