surely it is a good thing
STU - I think there is a big difference between living beyond your means and taking on a planned debt (like a mortgage) that you can cope with. You need to differentiate between secured and unsecured debt as well
You can sell a house (eventually). You cannot sell a holiday you took in 2009 or a fabulous Christmas......
We're in debt, lots of it, it took us to the point of bankruptcy, and anyone who has been there will know how stressful and depressing that it.
All my fault, I've never been materialistic and never will be, it's just been a shocking mismanagement of personal finances.
So some lean years ahead and we definitely live within our means and are paying it off. There is no spare cash, none.
Never stick your head in the sand when it comes to financial matters, deal with it, you still have your health and people still love you.
there are differences Madge agreed but I think it is interesting to look at what if we all said no to debt and lived within our means. Perhaps we could leave mortgages aside to keep it simpler. Would our economy welcome no personal loans being had and folk living within their means?
KK - I undertand that position and many of us are in it (we are paying off now and little to spare). The question still stands what if we all said nope to it all? What would happen to our economy (leaving mortgages aside for ease)?
Stu : Why do you feel the need to broadcast your inadequacies across the forum every day ?
A vast proportion of the population DO live with their means, and as Madge says only take on the debt they can service.
Just because you seem to struggle doesn;t mean the rest of us do
we are managing DTXS (just) -and are the vast majority living within their means? Anyway, question is if we all lived withing our means and said no to debt would it be good for our economy. Is it your inadequacy that detracts you from considering the question?
many of us think we should return to this sort of attitude and state of affairs
What Madge says,
People should learn to save for what they want like generations before had to do and need to accept that if they can't afford it, they can't have it.
You don't have to live like a pauper - holiday in Greece not Florida; wear M&S Limited Collection shoes not Manolo Blahniks; have the set menu or 2 courses instead of 3 when you eat out - you can buy a bottle of wine and a dessert at the supermarket on the way home if you really want to; take your own lunch to work...
There are literally hundreds of ways to leave more within your means - and keep the wheels of the economy turning - without being at all deprived.
yes screamy (I take the same approach) but is it good for the economy that we do as you suggest and simply say no to debt and live within our means? That is the question. If we all did it would it not have a negative effect on the economy?
I believe we should all do it too but that aint the question really.
Stu, I think that if the country can't live without debt then the country has done us all a disservice.
Anyway, I can't do money stuff, I need coffee and a doughnut!
... And off to work.......
Have a good morning all.
I have considered the question,
And therefore live within my means,
I only have a debt that I can service (mortgage).
I use a credit card to save me carrying cash, which I clear every month, I also get vouchers from it every 1/4.
I own my car, I have no store cards, If I need something I buy it, If I want (there is a difference between need and want) I save up for it.
As we were talking yesterday, responsibility.. I like to think I'm grown up and responsible, and haven't got myself into a mess
Of course it would have a negative effect on the economy. No borrowing = no interest paid on borrowing = no interest to pay on savings just for a start.
As Madge says, it's about living within your means and that doesn't just mean a cash only society. It means balancing your incomings and outgoings on a short/medium and longterm basis.
kittenkat wrote (see)
KK - I agree with with you 100% but feel that is what the country is actually doing and the economy demands we get more indebted If we all said no - what would happen to growth with they all bang on about?
I will ask again DTXS -what if we did what you did (which is what I aim to be able to do)?
STU - wrote (see)
KK - I agree with with you 100% but feel that is what the country is actually doing and the economy demands we get more indebted
What nonsense - how does the economy demand that we get more indebted? I haven't noticed anything demanding we take on any debt at all, unless you are considering the indebtedness of the nation in its national finances, where we are still increasing our national debt.
If everyone lived within their means and those who didn't weren't servicing debt there would be more disposable income freed up for people to spend as they wished, so the economy wouldn't go belly up!
I used to work with the over-indebted and the excuses that they always made were "They offered me the card so I had to take it" or "They put my credit limit up". So what? If you can't afford it, don't spend it - simple! Plenty of us have credit thrown at us from all angles and are able to say no thank you - it's not rocket science!
yes screamy (I take the same approach) but is it good for the economy that we do as you suggest and simply say no to debt and live within our means? That is the question. If we all did it would it not have a negative effect on the economy?I believe we should all do it too but that aint the question really.
Surely it's the only way for the economy to remain strong, stable and sustainable long term? I think what everybody, including politicians have to get their heads around is that sharp upward growth cannot be infinite, Boom will always be followed by bust . I am not an economist and I am totally sh*te at maths - but if I can understand that you can't continuously fuel the economy with debt - that eventually you have to pay for what you "buy" then anyone can.
One of the reasons France suffered less than some European countries during the current recession is that economic growth there was always small. Added to which housing debt there is almost non existent because practically everybody rents (it is cheaper). They still have the same long-term issues like longer life expectancy etc. but are better placed to deal with them - and while we are accepting eventual retirement at 68 they are up in arms about retiring at 62!
And I will answer again !!!
Living with in my means doesn't mean I have stopped spending, Doesn't mean that someone isn;t employed to manage my credit card, Doesn't mean my bank manager is out of a job (By the way my Bank Manager is called Andy, a real person in a real bank in Crewe)
I have my car serviced at a main dealer, I had a custom time trial bike built last year, we had 2 foreign holidays... But we saved up (must be someone managing that I suppose) rather than bang it on the plastic.
The pub in the next village does 2 for 1 on Wednesday evenings, So we often take advantage of that, keeps the pub staff in work and the chef.
We buy our food carefully at proper shops rather than supermarkets (in fact Sue has just left so she can call at the fish mongers before work).
See I am generating loads of job opportunities, With out living beyond my means..
Full enough answer ?
Screamapillar wrote (see)
Screamy I agree totally. Infinite growth on a finite planet just doen't go at all and yes politicians and so called economists need to get their head 'round that rather quickly.
we are constantly fuelling the economy with debt -it is a Global thing.
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |