Lance Armstrong

18 messages
20/02/2013 at 21:15

You are a lying cheating barsteward who hasn't got the courage to own up and face the consequences. Unless its to Oprah !! 

WiB
21/02/2013 at 07:51
Have you been in a coma? I'm not sure he will read it either, sorry.
WiB
PSC    pirate
21/02/2013 at 07:53

yesterday's news surely...  we are into the paralympics now!

21/02/2013 at 08:11

You are doing to explode when the news of Oscar gets through to you

21/02/2013 at 08:26
Did you hear about Ben Johnson?
21/02/2013 at 08:26

did you know micheal jackson is dead  

21/02/2013 at 09:11

And Elvis?

21/02/2013 at 09:15
Wilkie wrote (see)

And Elvis?

 

Elvis is'nt dead he just went home!

21/02/2013 at 10:17
Millsy1977 wrote (see)
Did you hear about Ben Johnson?

Ben Johnson the man who failed exactly the same number of drugs tests as Carl Lewis?

Funny how history judges people.

21/02/2013 at 10:49
Jason Wintin wrote (see)
Wilkie wrote (see)

And Elvis?

 

Elvis is'nt dead he just went home!

Bionic Ironwolf    pirate
21/02/2013 at 11:47

I think Slowfoot's post was prompted by today's news that Armstrong has now refused to testify to the USADA although he stated on Oprah he would be the first through the doors.

21/02/2013 at 15:13

yes. it is actually news. sort of.

surprising. i thought the whole point of the confessing bit was so he could compete again.

21/02/2013 at 15:26

From what I interpreted, Lance doesn't want to go in and testify against individuals and name names.

And i think thats fair enough.

He absolutely should be testifying in an open talk about the culture, the loopholes which were exploited, how they got away with it -  But naming names and turning it into a witch hunt? Not for me.

 

 

21/02/2013 at 15:34

ah. so he's a liar, a cheat and a bully...but not a rat. at least he has some scruples

21/02/2013 at 15:46
mattywarr wrote (see)

 But naming names and turning it into a witch hunt? Not for me.

  

my dog - a Lance apologist! don't see many of them around these days....

21/02/2013 at 15:50
mattywarr wrote (see)

From what I interpreted, Lance doesn't want to go in and testify against individuals and name names.

And i think thats fair enough.

He absolutely should be testifying in an open talk about the culture, the loopholes which were exploited, how they got away with it -  But naming names and turning it into a witch hunt? Not for me.

 

 

 But we already know how he got away with it - plenty of riders have talked about the culture etc etc - unless he names names then he's got nothing to offer.   

21/02/2013 at 16:03
the dude abides wrote (see)

ah. so he's a liar, a cheat and a bully...but not a rat. at least he has some scruples

Nope.  IMO he is more worried about civil suits that will be pursued against him.  Not a moral bone in that body.

21/02/2013 at 16:16
fat buddha wrote (see)
mattywarr wrote (see)

 But naming names and turning it into a witch hunt? Not for me.

  

my dog - a Lance apologist! don't see many of them around these days....



I'm not apologising for him - but if it were me, I'd probably do the same thing.

 


We'd love you to add a comment! Please login or take half a minute to register as a free member
18 messages
Previously bookmarked threads are now visible in "Followed Threads". You can also manage notifications on these threads from the "Forum Settings" section of your profile settings page to prevent being sent an email when a reply is made.
Forum Jump  

RW Forums