No More Page 3

Does this still happen?

61 to 74 of 74 messages
12/06/2013 at 16:33

Are you saying you use actually Starbucks? Burn the witch! 

12/06/2013 at 16:35

Ok other campaigns are having a go at Loaded but there does seem to be at least one that's just about The Sun.  I'm pretty sure last time I had my hair cut (admittedly a few years ago now) they had Nuts/Loaded.

 

The Sun apparently has 2.5 million female readers so they can't be that fussed.

12/06/2013 at 16:36

I do agree that censorship isnt the answer - I am glad that protesters are going to stockists and advertisers rather than calling for censorship (at least thats what they were doing last time I checked). Might encourage a bit of corporate responsibility as well (though I know its all about PR and ultimately sales really)

12/06/2013 at 16:36

Did I say I use actually Starbucks Yoda?

12/06/2013 at 16:37
Sussex Runner (NLR) wrote (see)

Did I say I use actually Starbucks Yoda?

I asking was just 

Edited: 12/06/2013 at 16:38
12/06/2013 at 16:39
XFR Bear wrote (see)

 

The Sun apparently has 2.5 million female readers so they can't be that fussed.

Perhaps they just look at the pictures ? 

12/06/2013 at 16:39
Dave The Ex- Spartan wrote (see)

I wonder what Tesco will pay me to work the checkout topless ? 

If it means you stop going bottomless and pressing your ass against the plastic screen, I suspect they will.

12/06/2013 at 16:47

"unauthorised item in bagging area"

12/06/2013 at 20:37
Sussex Runner (NLR) wrote (see)

I guess I would love to hear from Sun readers. Are there any out there? 

Sussex Runner (NLR) wrote (see)

I have voted Caroline Lucas into power...

Sussex Runner (NLR) wrote (see)

... The Sun can seem harmless to you when you live in an intelligent community... 

Sussex Runner (NLR) wrote (see)

... we have a nudist beach but people often go topless on the regular beaches.

A green voter, from "an intelligent community" who checks out the beaches wltm a Sun reader.

And I thought you were a classic Tory voting Sun reader, complaining about PC politicians trying to deprive you of your topless teenagers.

Edited: 12/06/2013 at 20:38
13/06/2013 at 08:16

So you were wrong then Canute. What point is it you're trying to make?

13/06/2013 at 08:30
Sussex Runner (NLR) wrote (see)

 I'm not offended by a pair of tits but wonder why it has to be some sort of daily ritual for some people. Really, how do the target audience react to page 3? 

 

That's a hard one.

 

(carefully typed)

14/06/2013 at 16:09

They call it a family newspaper, but it has boobs on page 3. Normally that type of material would be top shelf stuff. It's about time that they scrapped the tits on page 3. This is the 21st century for goodness sake.

Not that it would bother Murdoch and his media empire. Morality is the last thing on his mind, as was shown by the Leverson enquiry.

17/06/2013 at 22:02
Screamapillar wrote (see)

So you were wrong then Canute. What point is it you're trying to make?

Just quotin.  

Can you work him out?

27/07/2013 at 18:25

You'll never see a nipple in the Daily Express.

Just quotin. 


We'd love you to add a comment! Please login or take half a minute to register as a free member
61 to 74 of 74 messages
Previously bookmarked threads are now visible in "Followed Threads". You can also manage notifications on these threads from the "Forum Settings" section of your profile settings page to prevent being sent an email when a reply is made.
Forum Jump  

RW Forums