that may be the case Wilkie, but they are doing a hatchet job. the assessment process is totally unfair, totally biased towards getting people off sickness benefit regardless. it's the height of hypocricy for them to sponsor the paralympics.
if they are going to do these assessments they should be done by medically qualified personnel who specialise in the area of disability/health problems. this isn't the case.
having been (and still on) the receiving end of the fecking raw deal this shower are handing out to EVERYONE, not weeding out the piss takers, that's where I have an issue. their sponsorship leaves a hugely bitter taste
Of those who fail ATOS tests, 40% win on appeal - any test that has such a high failure rate (surely a win on appeal must count as a failure) has MASSIVE flaws
Visit the official Runner's World page
Follow Runner's World on Twitter
Other Natmag-Rodale Sites
Run For Charity
About Runner's World
Runner's World is a publication of Hearst Magazines UK which is the trading name of The National Magazine Company Ltd, 72 Broadwick Street, London, W1F 9EP. Registered in England 112955. All rights reserved.
Website powered by: Immediate Media Company Ltd. | © Runner's World 2002-2013 |