Should the Paralympics be scheduled before the Olympics?

21 to 23 of 23 messages
30/08/2012 at 18:47

that may be the case Wilkie, but they are doing a hatchet job. the assessment process is totally unfair, totally biased towards getting people off sickness benefit regardless. it's the height of hypocricy for them to sponsor the paralympics.

if they are going to do these assessments they should be done by medically qualified personnel who specialise in the area of disability/health problems. this isn't the case. 

having been (and still on) the receiving end of the fecking raw deal this shower are handing  out to EVERYONE, not weeding out the piss takers, that's where I have an issue. their sponsorship leaves a hugely bitter taste 

30/08/2012 at 19:28
05/09/2012 at 02:08

Of those who fail ATOS tests, 40% win on appeal - any test that has such a high failure rate (surely a win on appeal must count as a failure) has MASSIVE flaws


We'd love you to add a comment! Please login or take half a minute to register as a free member
21 to 23 of 23 messages
Previously bookmarked threads are now visible in "Followed Threads". You can also manage notifications on these threads from the "Forum Settings" section of your profile settings page to prevent being sent an email when a reply is made.
Forum Jump  

RW Forums